Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm looking for a pair of quality headphones that aren't seemingly made of glass. I'm an avid BMXer which causes me to frequently bash on any type of technology that joins me for my daily riding. I've been through the higher quality headsets in the Skullcandy line as these are supposed to be built for "abuse," which is laughable. I cant wear earbuds or canal buds, as my large ears seem to have a repelling property upon anything that sits in them. Wired or Bluetooth doesn't really matter, but I need something that can hold up to taking a few hits every now and again. I'm trying to keep 'em under $150. Thanks!"
I'm noting a distinct lack of Star Trek V in that list.
Not that I'm complaining.
"What does God need with a starship" indeed...
I know I'm in the minority, but that was NOT a bad movie -- at its core. The novelization was much better than the movie itself because the novel dealt with a lot of personality, emotional, and - yes - spiritual issues that were not translated well into the movie. Of course, the fact that ILM was not available to do the special effects didn't help at all. (God! I hope that special effects company went belly up...) And we all know the stories about budget and time issues during filming.
Walking out of the theater I recognized it as a movie that had potential that simply didn't make it on the screen. A lot of people that I know who read the novelization agree with that.
Personally, I wish that Shatner was given the same courtesy as others to go back and "fix" Start Trek 5 to what it was supposed to be. I'd love to see it in its "intended" state.
@John B
Yeah, its not a BAD movie, but it just left such a bad taste compared to the "trilogy" that came before it, and then with VI after it, it just stands out as a black sheep.
But if Paramount releases individual movies here, It would probably be the second to last I pick up of the 10 films (because I'll only buy Nemesis last, and only because my inner collector demands it.)
That movie wasn't bad in the same sense that the new indiana jones movie wasn't bad. On it's own it'd be a decent B movie to stick on late night sci fi, but to put star trek in there... eww. II III IV and VI would be an excellent box set. I'd jizm my pants if paramount actually does that instead of making us pay for I and V along with the good movies.
We can all agree though, Wrath of Khan is going to ROCK on blu!