I payed $10 to see it in 3d (RealD) at a really high end theater, and I thought that was still a bit much. I really enjoyed the movie, but I was in the RARE mood for a mindless old-school slasher movie and had low expectations going in. Still, I wasn't really impressed with the polarization technology. I though the depth of the 3d was great, but the glasses made the screen too dark and strained my eyes a bit. Motion looked choppy to me, and it always took me a second to focus on changing scenes. I really don't see the medium taking off with these problems. I'd actually like to try the shutter glasses for my new 3d samsung tv, but don't have $200 for a pair and I doubt the technology could ever make it to theaters.
“That iconic Klipsch sound is here in full force, with crisp highs, delicate mids (which can easily have a bit more meat added with an EQ tweak) and tight, booming bass.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I payed $10 to see it in 3d (RealD) at a really high end theater, and I thought that was still a bit much. I really enjoyed the movie, but I was in the RARE mood for a mindless old-school slasher movie and had low expectations going in. Still, I wasn't really impressed with the polarization technology. I though the depth of the 3d was great, but the glasses made the screen too dark and strained my eyes a bit. Motion looked choppy to me, and it always took me a second to focus on changing scenes. I really don't see the medium taking off with these problems. I'd actually like to try the shutter glasses for my new 3d samsung tv, but don't have $200 for a pair and I doubt the technology could ever make it to theaters.