<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sure, traffic they deem important gets first dibs.  Then, website & content providers that pay Cox money get first dibs.<br><br>We voted net neutrality into the Whitehouse, now's the time for them to start taking action.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 9:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well said.  <br><br>Policy like this opens the flood gates for ISPs to prioritize their bandwidth to select content providers.  And by "select" I mean, "the ones who pay said ISP an incentive donation."  Frankly, I think that kind of business should be illegal - right along with the lobbyists.  <br>It's on the new administration's shoulders now.. Where's our net neutrality!?  <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jyncus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 10:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is great. Now people who need bandwidth for time-sensitive activities like gaming (clutch) or streaming Netflix aren't completely impeded by neighbors downloading gigs and gigs of Windows 7 or pirated movies. If just adding more bandwidth is prohibitively expensive, this is the best solution. Everybody's worried about the day that Google pays Cox to slow down Yahoo - let's wait until that day arrives to start bitching about it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[C. T.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 2:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you want people to stop clogging up your internet speed it up.<br>Why can't we be more like japan with internet price and speed?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Doc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 10:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</guid><description><![CDATA[Take a globe, cut out Japan lay it on top of the US... there is your reason why we do not have the bandwidth they do.   That is a big reason.  The other reason is we were early adopters of technologies that required a large investment in infrastructure changing that overnight to accommodate emerging technologies is not a cheap investment.  We want ... need high speed internet and once we get into the Gig range we will not truly see innovative uses by the end user but we want these speeds cheap and now. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fizzler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 7:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</guid><description><![CDATA[You didnt know? Throttling is the COOLest...<br><br>You aint cool, unless you throttle your pants...<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[numerwan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 10:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</guid><description><![CDATA[Last year stories were there was a massive build-up of bandwidth and way more than we could use.<br><br>Now, they come up with a business model that ignores reality.<br><br>Go figure.<br><br>Scumbags. For once I'm glad to be a Time-Warner user not in Texas.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 11:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</guid><description><![CDATA[Luckily for my parents, they both dropped Cox Cable and went with AT&T's package for internet and cable.  Nuts to Cox.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ike Skelton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have cox for all of my services ,and even thought about switching to at&t, but after seeing the picture quality I had to pass. As far as internet goes I wouldn't trade if they paid me.<br><br>Then again I think that it depends on what area you're in too. My service is great, but that might have something to do with the fresh fiber they laid..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Doc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 12:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</guid><description><![CDATA[America has lame prices and lame speeds. I have FIOS 10mbps for over $50 p/month......WTF? Or I go with cable and get 1.5 or 6mbps?  <br><br>LAME!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 12:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess it all really depends on the carriers in your area. I have cox and my internet with a bundle of course isn't bad IMO. I pay around $40 for 20-25 down/ 4-5 up, and I also have speed boost too and that makes a huge difference for my netflix, xboxlive, and any streaming or DL service(hulu).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Doc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 12:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think I would be for Cox's data management policies because I would like my youtube/video and PS3 games to work faster, while I don't mind that most website get a slight delay ( I hope its only ms). Assuming Cox will not play favorites with companies and not block apps like Comcast, then I support the use to speed up time sensitive applications. It would also be a plus if Cox fully explained what ports and apps are going to be affected for transparency. <br><br>I already use QoS in my company so important apps get pushed first and my response from people so far has been they really enjoy it. Video conferencing and gotomypc have been stabilized since we applied the new policy. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 2:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cox Suckers!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kimbo Slice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 3:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</guid><description><![CDATA[It really surprises me how little grief Cox gets by the public for their Internet polices.  The country is in an uproar over Comcast's 250gb a month limit, but here are Cox's limits, which have been in effect for several years.  They were taken right off of cox.com.<br><br>Premier:<br>Maximum monthly consumption cap  	60 gigabytes downstream; 15 gigabytes upstream<br><br>Preferred:<br>Maximum monthly consumption cap  	40 gigabytes downstream; 10 gigabytes upstream<br><br>Value Package:<br>Maximum monthly consumption cap  	4 gigabytes downstream; 1gigabyte upstream<br><br>Economy Package:<br>Maximum monthly consumption cap  	3 gigabytes downstream; 1gigabyte upstream<br> ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kingpcgeek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 5:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder how much my gaming uses up? I hate the notion of caps!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Doc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 6:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</guid><description><![CDATA[The notion of QoS makes completely sense I think they are going about it all wrong and for the wrong reasons.  Any leecher worth his weight can easily get around these limitations.  Want to impose priority on torrent use port 80 which will be a higher priority.  <br><br>Now the notion of caps does not make sense.  This will only lessen the development or adoption of innovative content.  I believe the idea of caps is in place more to protect the providers content rather than the limiting of their bandwidth.  If you were Cox or Comcast with VOD services would you want your customer using Netflix? Youtube just added HD Video which is a great service providing the end user a better experience but the file sizes will be larger.. limiting downloads will only place limits on innovation.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fizzler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 7:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cox follows Comcast down the data discrimination road]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/29/cox-follows-comcast-down-the-data-discrimination-road/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cox isn't the only one's capping. Verizon wireless internet has capped my internet down to 200Kbps from 2.2Mbps !!!!<br>Verizon's limit is 5 gig's<br><br>They admit it too! and they even threatened me to kick me out from Verizon if I don't stop using so much bandwith.<br><br>What i'm doing.. I'm not gonna pay for 2 months which will ad up $120. I simply won't pay it.<br>They eventually gonna report it on my credit, but I can easily dispute it during holiday busy season and have it cleared. I WIN!! and Teach them a lesson!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2009 1:10AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>