If CBHD isn't going to get momentum, why would this?
A red laser HD format might have gotten traction three or four years ago, but right now blue-violent isn't a barrier any more. The issue with CBHD wasn't that it was expensive to make, it was that studios weren't going to support it. And there's no reason to suppose that's false for any of the other formats either.
Short of a large government actually banning competing formats, there's no chance any competing technologies will gain any traction right now, even given Blu-ray has turned out to be such a trainwreck.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
If CBHD isn't going to get momentum, why would this?
A red laser HD format might have gotten traction three or four years ago, but right now blue-violent isn't a barrier any more. The issue with CBHD wasn't that it was expensive to make, it was that studios weren't going to support it. And there's no reason to suppose that's false for any of the other formats either.
Short of a large government actually banning competing formats, there's no chance any competing technologies will gain any traction right now, even given Blu-ray has turned out to be such a trainwreck.
Blu-ray a "trainwreck". Yeah right...BS!