3D for me is just stupid. I have one good eye and one bad eye. So even if I did have the glasses (I didn't, b/c I didn't know about it) it wouldn't have mattered. If they want me (and many other people I know with vision problems) to care, they're going to need to make it work without glasses - or at least with glasses that don't depend on two equally functioning eyes.
I was annoyed to have to watch Chuck in "3D" last night and just have to see something that looked like it was just a crappy quality, non-HD, episode.
Let more people really catch on to HD first. Then if they're happy with that, maybe try out some 3D stuff - but make sure the technology is there - don't just use crappy paper glasses.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
3D for me is just stupid. I have one good eye and one bad eye. So even if I did have the glasses (I didn't, b/c I didn't know about it) it wouldn't have mattered. If they want me (and many other people I know with vision problems) to care, they're going to need to make it work without glasses - or at least with glasses that don't depend on two equally functioning eyes.
I was annoyed to have to watch Chuck in "3D" last night and just have to see something that looked like it was just a crappy quality, non-HD, episode.
Let more people really catch on to HD first. Then if they're happy with that, maybe try out some 3D stuff - but make sure the technology is there - don't just use crappy paper glasses.