I think you guys are missing the point. It's going to affect quality either way.
Dr. Xym, usable size of Blu-ray disc is not 50gb it's 45gb. So add features and a game at 8.5gb you will have to pack a movie at 30gb or so.
They will have to cut corners. I'm just talking about hypocrisy here. They will have to lower the encodes to fit it and I find it really funny to see blu-ray die hards who were purists until this moment defend this as nothing is wrong.
Some of the people were the loudest how these type of things were unacceptable and now defend this.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I think you guys are missing the point. It's going to affect quality either way.
Dr. Xym, usable size of Blu-ray disc is not 50gb it's 45gb. So add features and a game at 8.5gb you will have to pack a movie at 30gb or so.
They will have to cut corners. I'm just talking about hypocrisy here. They will have to lower the encodes to fit it and I find it really funny to see blu-ray die hards who were purists until this moment defend this as nothing is wrong.
Some of the people were the loudest how these type of things were unacceptable and now defend this.