<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for SCTE considering a 3D over cable standard</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/02/21/scte-considering-a-3d-over-cable-standard/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for SCTE considering a 3D over cable standard</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SCTE considering a 3D over cable standard]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/02/21/scte-considering-a-3d-over-cable-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/02/21/scte-considering-a-3d-over-cable-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[cool! finally! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yuriythebest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2009 10:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SCTE considering a 3D over cable standard]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/02/21/scte-considering-a-3d-over-cable-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/02/21/scte-considering-a-3d-over-cable-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think they need to get on this, otherwise we will be stuck with the manufacturers putting their own (likely incompatible) standards in place.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[madgamer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2009 3:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SCTE considering a 3D over cable standard]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/02/21/scte-considering-a-3d-over-cable-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/02/21/scte-considering-a-3d-over-cable-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[So lame.  The cable guys are trying to establish their value when in reality this problem has nothing to do with cable at all.  it is a file format problem and one that should be addressed by the MPEG committee, not by anything to do with the cable consortiums]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[earthling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2009 8:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SCTE considering a 3D over cable standard]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/02/21/scte-considering-a-3d-over-cable-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/02/21/scte-considering-a-3d-over-cable-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, but if the cable providers start getting into the action, then it may move the MPEG committees to take similar action for a universal 3D delivery standard. I like the move, as Coraline in 3D really sold me on it being viable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[carterman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2009 9:01PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>