The fact that you have to replace the bulb is why I never even considered a RPTV. You are getting an inferior picture and you don't really save any money at all in the long run.
The bulb didn't scare me away, but the inferior picture part did. Plasma kicked DLP's arse 3 years ago, and now it's even farther ahead. Too bad LCD is going to squash them both, even though it's also inferior to Plasma. Nothing like misleading marketing, misinformation, and consumer ignorance to enable inferior products to snuff out superior ones. Thank you Samsung.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
The fact that you have to replace the bulb is why I never even considered a RPTV. You are getting an inferior picture and you don't really save any money at all in the long run.
The bulb didn't scare me away, but the inferior picture part did. Plasma kicked DLP's arse 3 years ago, and now it's even farther ahead. Too bad LCD is going to squash them both, even though it's also inferior to Plasma. Nothing like misleading marketing, misinformation, and consumer ignorance to enable inferior products to snuff out superior ones. Thank you Samsung.