<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for DRA audio coding technology gains BDA approval </title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/03/19/dra-audio-coding-technology-gains-bda-approval/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for DRA audio coding technology gains BDA approval </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DRA audio coding technology gains BDA approval ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/03/19/dra-audio-coding-technology-gains-bda-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/03/19/dra-audio-coding-technology-gains-bda-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[For China, I am not suprised to hear this news.  But in other countries, I see studios using either PCM or DTS for high resolution multichannel music discs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hey hey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2009 4:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DRA audio coding technology gains BDA approval ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/03/19/dra-audio-coding-technology-gains-bda-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/03/19/dra-audio-coding-technology-gains-bda-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe I'm missing something, but what's the point of yet another audio format?  AFAIK, it brings nothing new to the table.  Is it just because the Chinese wanted to get in on it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Digital Freak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2009 8:22PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>