That is too bad, but I really think that it's due to LCD sales. With resepcts to production cost, everything that I've read over the years say that OLED production is easier and MUCH cheaper to produce than your trditional LCD TV so I dont' think production costs are really the case. Samsungs new Luxia LCD's are expensive but because they are extrememly thin many will buy them and I think they are banking on it. Also, I'm sure they know when their competitors timelines are for OLED as well.
IF they solve some of the lifespan issues then anyone who comes out with an OLED TV in a good size, 42+ would be selling out of them, that is how good they look.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
That is too bad, but I really think that it's due to LCD sales. With resepcts to production cost, everything that I've read over the years say that OLED production is easier and MUCH cheaper to produce than your trditional LCD TV so I dont' think production costs are really the case. Samsungs new Luxia LCD's are expensive but because they are extrememly thin many will buy them and I think they are banking on it. Also, I'm sure they know when their competitors timelines are for OLED as well.
IF they solve some of the lifespan issues then anyone who comes out with an OLED TV in a good size, 42+ would be selling out of them, that is how good they look.