http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/samsungs-2009-blu-ray-player-lineup-officially-priced/ Engadget Comments for Samsung's 2009 Blu-ray player lineup officially priced http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/samsungs-2009-blu-ray-player-lineup-officially-priced/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/samsungs-2009-blu-ray-player-lineup-officially-priced/I like the non square one, but I'm not sure the price and model number...

Could you provide this info please ?]]>Mar 31st 2009 1:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/samsungs-2009-blu-ray-player-lineup-officially-priced/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/samsungs-2009-blu-ray-player-lineup-officially-priced/
the square one is the 1600
the one that gets wider as it gets near the top in the first picture on the left is the 3600
and the thinner more rectangle but oval one with the red accents is the 4600]]>Mar 31st 2009 2:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/samsungs-2009-blu-ray-player-lineup-officially-priced/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/samsungs-2009-blu-ray-player-lineup-officially-priced/Mar 31st 2009 4:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/samsungs-2009-blu-ray-player-lineup-officially-priced/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/samsungs-2009-blu-ray-player-lineup-officially-priced/
OK! So what's the real story?!!!! Anyone know? I can't imagine Samsung being that stupid and make that type of quality change that singled them out on the market. But then . . . . .

. . . fb

P.S.
AND WHAT WERE THEY THINKING with the new form factors. Maybe they did go nutz and trashed the product line. It wouldn't be teh first time that East did not meet West.]]>Apr 1st 2009 1:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/samsungs-2009-blu-ray-player-lineup-officially-priced/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/samsungs-2009-blu-ray-player-lineup-officially-priced/Apr 1st 2009 1:16PM