Whatever happened to the Westinghouse QuadHD monitor? I guess they didn't see a market for it.
As far as the pic with the article, whats the point if you just have more windows open? Why not just get multiple monitors? The point of this thing is to blow the image up to full resolution, otherwise you're wasting money when you could get multiple monitors with really good color gamut and such.
For consumers, it doesn't need to get any better than 1080p I've found that at proper viewing distance, my vision is filled, so more resolution would just be a waste. I'm not going to sit closer just so I have to move my head back and forth to follow the action.
For those looking for a device strictly for reading, the new Kobo is a nice little option. It's small enough to slip into a pocket, can do more with a PDF than the competition, and at $129, it's $10 cheaper than both the Nook and Kindle WiFi.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
The term you're looking for is QuadHD.
Whatever happened to the Westinghouse QuadHD monitor? I guess they didn't see a market for it.
As far as the pic with the article, whats the point if you just have more windows open? Why not just get multiple monitors? The point of this thing is to blow the image up to full resolution, otherwise you're wasting money when you could get multiple monitors with really good color gamut and such.
For consumers, it doesn't need to get any better than 1080p I've found that at proper viewing distance, my vision is filled, so more resolution would just be a waste. I'm not going to sit closer just so I have to move my head back and forth to follow the action.