Meanwhile, RED moves right along with their mystery compression which seems to defy the implied challenge of newer and better codecs - and perhaps reality itself.
I would be a lot happier for the rest of the encoding community to put all of this time, money and energy in doing what RED is 'supposedly' doing. I don't EVER see the need for that many pixels for a cinema application.
Computer/workstation practical applications are another thing all together. But that's not what the MOVING PICTURE Expert Group do.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Meanwhile, RED moves right along with their mystery compression which seems to defy the implied challenge of newer and better codecs - and perhaps reality itself.
I would be a lot happier for the rest of the encoding community to put all of this time, money and energy in doing what RED is 'supposedly' doing. I don't EVER see the need for that many pixels for a cinema application.
Computer/workstation practical applications are another thing all together. But that's not what the MOVING PICTURE Expert Group do.