<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Marantz KI Pearl SACD player and integrated amp -- audiophile tested, Ken Ishiwata-approved</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Marantz KI Pearl SACD player and integrated amp -- audiophile tested, Ken Ishiwata-approved</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Marantz KI Pearl SACD player and integrated amp -- audiophile tested, Ken Ishiwata-approved]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</guid><description><![CDATA[As a big Marantz fan, I love the blue detail lighting...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[letstakeawalk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 9th 2009 11:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Marantz KI Pearl SACD player and integrated amp -- audiophile tested, Ken Ishiwata-approved]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</guid><description><![CDATA[SACD. reissues mostly or are there some new releases.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bedbathandbyahhh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 10th 2009 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Marantz KI Pearl SACD player and integrated amp -- audiophile tested, Ken Ishiwata-approved]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</guid><description><![CDATA[LOTS or re-releases, but also a large number of new acts.<br><br>Here's a great source:<br><br><a href="http://www.sa-cd.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sa-cd.net/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[letstakeawalk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 10th 2009 4:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Marantz KI Pearl SACD player and integrated amp -- audiophile tested, Ken Ishiwata-approved]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd buy it on looks alone...if I did not have a Primare rig ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 10th 2009 12:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Marantz KI Pearl SACD player and integrated amp -- audiophile tested, Ken Ishiwata-approved]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've been thinking about getting some SACD's to take advantage of the SACD capabilities of the PS3. Is it worth the hassle and extra cost if I'm listening through headphones, and not a dedicated 5.1 system? I can't seem to figure out if the stereo mixes are of a higher quality on SACD's, or if the 5.1 mixes are the only benefit. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BananaBoat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 10th 2009 12:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Marantz KI Pearl SACD player and integrated amp -- audiophile tested, Ken Ishiwata-approved]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</guid><description><![CDATA[There's a few bad apples but mostly SACDs are drastically superior in sound if you are listening through good headphones of a good system. All of the new releases nowadays are classical/jazz. Check amazon for SACDs, there are a ton of them. I have a pretty large collection and enjoy listening to them because they are SO crystal clear and dynamic. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[blackacex2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 10th 2009 12:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Marantz KI Pearl SACD player and integrated amp -- audiophile tested, Ken Ishiwata-approved]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow, an overly priced piece of sound equipment made for an obscure, nearly-dead audio format that never went anywhere and only .5% of the population actually cared about.<br><br>SIGN ME UP! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 10th 2009 2:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Marantz KI Pearl SACD player and integrated amp -- audiophile tested, Ken Ishiwata-approved]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</guid><description><![CDATA[+1<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iamjoecollector]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 10th 2009 3:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Marantz KI Pearl SACD player and integrated amp -- audiophile tested, Ken Ishiwata-approved]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</guid><description><![CDATA[The funny thing is when these devises get blind tested and the so called "audiophiles" can't determine it from a $100 DVD player.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KJ4GR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 10th 2009 11:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Marantz KI Pearl SACD player and integrated amp -- audiophile tested, Ken Ishiwata-approved]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</guid><description><![CDATA[You should really hear Pink Floyd's DSOTM on SACD.  Then you'll understand.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[letstakeawalk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 10th 2009 4:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Marantz KI Pearl SACD player and integrated amp -- audiophile tested, Ken Ishiwata-approved]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</guid><description><![CDATA[SACD has embraced the fans of classical music, if you are not a fan of that genre then there is no need for you to have a SACD player now days. I wish they would get back into some of the newer rock! Also, to hear a diff over cd other then surround, you need to have good enough amps and speakers. This is why SACD failed to win over the average teenager buying with a Sony receiver and some cheap speakers, it doesn’t sound any better then MP3 played on junk!<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 10th 2009 6:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Marantz KI Pearl SACD player and integrated amp -- audiophile tested, Ken Ishiwata-approved]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pink Floyd's DSOTM SUCKS.<br> But if I paid $5000 for a CDP, then I guess I who try to justify it too. I would blind test it against my Marantz 5001 any day.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KJ4GR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 10th 2009 9:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Marantz KI Pearl SACD player and integrated amp -- audiophile tested, Ken Ishiwata-approved]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</guid><description><![CDATA[You are certainly entitled to your opinion; I just mentioned one of the most popular and recognizable recordings of all time - one that many people are familiar with in a variety of formats and that they would be able to readily recognize sound quality.  It's kind of like, you know, a reference.<br><br>That said, one of the biggest misconceptions I find among so-called A/V enthusiasts is that SACD requires a premium investment.  I'd love to have the Marantz in this article, but I am very satisfied with my older Yamaha DVD-C750.  It was cheap, has great playback of DVDs, upscales red book CDs, and has the SACD required 5.1 analogue outs - which I like because I prefer discrete amplifiers over an all-in-one surround amp.<br><br><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Yamaha-DVDC750-DVD-Video-SA-CD-Changer/dp/B0009DVQVA" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Yamaha-DVDC750-DVD-Video-SA-CD-Changer/dp/B0009DVQVA</a><br><br>Why not test the SA-KI (SACD) against your 5001(red book only)?  Then you'd actually know what you are talking about...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[letstakeawalk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 11th 2009 8:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Marantz KI Pearl SACD player and integrated amp -- audiophile tested, Ken Ishiwata-approved]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/09/marantz-ki-pearl-sacd-player-and-integrated-amp-audiophile-te/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Pearl is a GREAT sounding CDP/SACDP.  I bests my SA11S1 in several areas including bass impact and treble extsn.  It is however just a redress of the SA15S1-2 and it has issues with ticking or poping between tracks on some SACD's.  In the end I did not think it worth the asking price.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joe bob biggs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 27th 2009 11:53AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>