<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for US Senate intros bill to keep people from falling off the "digital cliff" </title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/10/us-senate-intros-bill-to-keep-people-from-falling-off-the-digit/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for US Senate intros bill to keep people from falling off the "digital cliff" </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Senate intros bill to keep people from falling off the "digital cliff" ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/10/us-senate-intros-bill-to-keep-people-from-falling-off-the-digit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/10/us-senate-intros-bill-to-keep-people-from-falling-off-the-digit/</guid><description><![CDATA[See every so often the government does something we all like]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 10th 2009 10:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Senate intros bill to keep people from falling off the "digital cliff" ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/10/us-senate-intros-bill-to-keep-people-from-falling-off-the-digit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/10/us-senate-intros-bill-to-keep-people-from-falling-off-the-digit/</guid><description><![CDATA[While it sounds great on the surface, you know the FCC will manage to screw this up somehow.  Personally, I'd rather see them working harder to reorganize and maximize the existing broadcast frequencies we still have left than start jumping on the repeater bandwagon.  I bet that 90% of the loss-of-service issues that will come 6/12 could be averted by an optimized frequency/power plan for the country's TV stations.  <br><br>I've never understood why this hasn't been done.  More than 33% of the TV spectrum will be freed up on June 12th when the full-power analogs disappear.  Rather than reallocating full power DTV channels for maximum coverage, we're going to fill up that spectrum with repeaters?  I live in what has to be one of the most 'busy' areas for TV, the Baltimore/Washington area, and the post-6/12 setup is rediculous.  We have a MAJOR channel (WBAL, NBC Baltimore) getting absolutely crippled to something like 5kW on VHF 11 post-transistion here.  They can't use more than 5kW (or whatever it is) because of potential interference issues.  They can't stay on UHF 59 for DTV because that channel was sold to the highest bidder by the FCC.  Maybe they desperately wanted to keep channel 11 becuase of their analog identity, but still ... 5kW?  <br><br>We'll see, but I'm cynical at best here. lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brehmm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 10th 2009 11:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Senate intros bill to keep people from falling off the "digital cliff" ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/10/us-senate-intros-bill-to-keep-people-from-falling-off-the-digit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/10/us-senate-intros-bill-to-keep-people-from-falling-off-the-digit/</guid><description><![CDATA[I fully agree I live near DC and will be losing all sorts of channels even some of the major ones , God help the people who live on the eastern shore and the west va part of the DC/Baltimore Metro Area they will be SOL even if they are completely ready for the switch]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Xoyuji]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 11th 2009 2:42PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>