<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Panasonic's DMP-B15 portable Blu-ray player: $800, ships this month</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/06/01/panasonics-dmp-b15-portable-blu-ray-player-800-ships-this-mo/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Panasonic's DMP-B15 portable Blu-ray player: $800, ships this month</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's DMP-B15 portable Blu-ray player: $800, ships this month]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/06/01/panasonics-dmp-b15-portable-blu-ray-player-800-ships-this-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/06/01/panasonics-dmp-b15-portable-blu-ray-player-800-ships-this-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I understand the technological advancements that this device represents, but why would anyone want a Blu-ray player that played on a screen thats only 80% of 720p. I would like to watch my Blu-rays on some sort of a portable player, either dedicated player or laptop, but I wouldn't settle for anything less than 720p from the screen.<br><br>Follow me on twitter @pluik for more discussion on tech.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 11:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's DMP-B15 portable Blu-ray player: $800, ships this month]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/06/01/panasonics-dmp-b15-portable-blu-ray-player-800-ships-this-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/06/01/panasonics-dmp-b15-portable-blu-ray-player-800-ships-this-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[For me, it's not the quality for the kids, but the idea that I can leave DVD behind forever.<br><br>I can have one format of disc for home and not have to explain to my 4-year-old that "Daddy doesn't have 'Cars' on DVD, only Blu-ray."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 11:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's DMP-B15 portable Blu-ray player: $800, ships this month]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/06/01/panasonics-dmp-b15-portable-blu-ray-player-800-ships-this-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/06/01/panasonics-dmp-b15-portable-blu-ray-player-800-ships-this-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[At first, I thought that was a reasonable price at this point.   Then I realized that for $800 I can find a laptop with a blu-ray player, and a better screen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[glenn s]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 12:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's DMP-B15 portable Blu-ray player: $800, ships this month]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/06/01/panasonics-dmp-b15-portable-blu-ray-player-800-ships-this-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/06/01/panasonics-dmp-b15-portable-blu-ray-player-800-ships-this-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[The question is at what distance must I be within in order to actually be able to resolve the resolution I am seeking and paying for? If I am sitting a few inches too far back then the resolution, and the Blu-ray are meaningless as I'd be paying for something I cannot resolve.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BarkingGhost]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 1:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's DMP-B15 portable Blu-ray player: $800, ships this month]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/06/01/panasonics-dmp-b15-portable-blu-ray-player-800-ships-this-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/06/01/panasonics-dmp-b15-portable-blu-ray-player-800-ships-this-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Only way I can see this fetching $800 is making it a oled 1920x1080 display.  I mean, you can debate the benefit of that resolution in this size all day long, but that will never be the point to me.  The point is 1024 X 600 lcd is a joke for an $800, albeit portable, blu ray player with a 9" display :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iouttolunch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 1:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's DMP-B15 portable Blu-ray player: $800, ships this month]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2009/06/01/panasonics-dmp-b15-portable-blu-ray-player-800-ships-this-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2009/06/01/panasonics-dmp-b15-portable-blu-ray-player-800-ships-this-mo/</guid><description><![CDATA[You know, I never thought about screen resolution when I bought a Panasonic DVD-L50 portable player for $800 back in 1999.  As it was it had more pixels than I could resolve with younger eyes.  Having a 9" 1080P HD display would just cost more money yet provide no tangible benefit.  As it is I expect that Pany will have no problem selling all that they can make.  <br><br>My story is that "since we need another BR player it really only is a $500 premium and it is much better on road trips than the laptop".  Will report back if it works.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ccweems]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 4:56PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>