I STRONGLY agree with you. General public has a mentality that LCDs have better picture quality than plasma TVs. Of course this this totally a false statement.
Many of LCD TV owners' excuse is that plasmas has that famous permenant "burn" effect. Again, they have no idea that plasmas don't have this problem anymore (Unless you freeze the screen for a day or something).
Anther excuse I heard is that they eat more electricity. This is true, but I think it's worth extra $1-2 dollars a month for better picture quality.
So final verdict:
The fact is that plasmas are cheaper AND have better picture quality. This is a win win situation!
“Getting too close completely blurred what we saw to the point of incomprehension, but again, this shows a whole heap of potential that's fascinating to us.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I STRONGLY agree with you. General public has a mentality that LCDs have better picture quality
than plasma TVs. Of course this this totally a false statement.
Many of LCD TV owners' excuse is that plasmas has that famous permenant "burn" effect.
Again, they have no idea that plasmas don't have this problem anymore (Unless you freeze the
screen for a day or something).
Anther excuse I heard is that they eat more electricity. This is true, but I think it's worth extra $1-2
dollars a month for better picture quality.
So final verdict:
The fact is that plasmas are cheaper AND have better picture quality. This is a win win situation!
This is a no brainer. End of story...