It would also be a point of order to mention that plasma 'operation' costs are more or less the same as an LCD. With a dark movie a plasma is more efficient than lcd but on the flipside, a bright movie uses more energy. Thus making the debate a wash overall. That being said, the new lines of plasmas from Samsung and Panasonic both claim significantly lower energy costs (40% less according to the specs) which would put the plasma technology on par with any lcd ( light and dark movie performance) out there not sporting led lighting.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
It would also be a point of order to mention that plasma 'operation' costs are more or less the same as an LCD. With a dark movie a plasma is more efficient than lcd but on the flipside, a bright movie uses more energy. Thus making the debate a wash overall. That being said, the new lines of plasmas from Samsung and Panasonic both claim significantly lower energy costs (40% less according to the specs) which would put the plasma technology on par with any lcd ( light and dark movie performance) out there not sporting led lighting.