Seriously. What can they be skimping on to make it $188.
I view blu-ray as a premium way to watch a movie. To get rid of HDMI, HD audio, Profile 2.0, etc... to drop the price, where is the benefit over a DVD?
Why not sell a version with only VGA output for $89?
Trust me, I want to see blu-ray be mainstream cause I want studios to strart releasing my fav tv shows on blu-ray but this method doesn't seem right. But then again, Vizio sells more HD tv's then anyone and not everyone has a home theatre setup.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I would rather buy $188 worth of toilet paper!
Seriously. What can they be skimping on to make it $188.
I view blu-ray as a premium way to watch a movie. To get rid of HDMI, HD audio, Profile 2.0, etc... to drop the price, where is the benefit over a DVD?
Why not sell a version with only VGA output for $89?
Trust me, I want to see blu-ray be mainstream cause I want studios to strart releasing my fav tv shows on blu-ray but this method doesn't seem right. But then again, Vizio sells more HD tv's then anyone and not everyone has a home theatre setup.