http://hd.engadget.com/2009/07/06/xyz-autostereoscopic-display-takes-the-glasses-out-of-3d-for-re/ Engadget HD Comments for xyZ autostereoscopic display takes the glasses out of 3D for (relatively) cheap http://hd.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://hd.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://hd.engadget.com/2009/07/06/xyz-autostereoscopic-display-takes-the-glasses-out-of-3d-for-re/http://hd.engadget.com/2009/07/06/xyz-autostereoscopic-display-takes-the-glasses-out-of-3d-for-re/http://current.com/items/90280686_3d-porn.htm

People talk about how the adult industry leads the way in technology and according to the link above similar technology is targeted for the adult films. The mention the the TV is at about 2:20. NSFW of course. ]]>Jul 6th 2009 4:34PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2009/07/06/xyz-autostereoscopic-display-takes-the-glasses-out-of-3d-for-re/http://hd.engadget.com/2009/07/06/xyz-autostereoscopic-display-takes-the-glasses-out-of-3d-for-re/
Personally, I don't see the problem with wearing glasses, since most people at least wear sunglasses occasionally anyway, and you generally get better quality. Passive-polarised displays are easier to view, though half the brightness, and need only ordinary sunglasses with differently-polarised lenses. Active-polarised displays give the best results but need bulkier LCD-shutter glasses, though these are getting rapidly smaller.]]>Jul 7th 2009 4:38AM