<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Engadget HD Podcast 158 - 10.06.2009</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/engadget-hd-podcast-158-10-06-2009/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Engadget HD Podcast 158 - 10.06.2009</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Podcast 158 - 10.06.2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/engadget-hd-podcast-158-10-06-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/engadget-hd-podcast-158-10-06-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why can't someone make a bluray player like the LG BD390 and add MCE extender capability to the player also. Oh, and add a hard drive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kevon27]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 6th 2009 4:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Podcast 158 - 10.06.2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/engadget-hd-podcast-158-10-06-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/engadget-hd-podcast-158-10-06-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a question for Ben: I bought a Panasonic P50G10 this week. This is my 3rd HD (50" bulb DLP, then a 56" LED DLP, which I still have) and the difference with a plasma is insane. I love it. Anyway, how paranoid do I need to be about burn-in? Do I need to fret when I have a Blu-ray paused to get a beer? I know the new generation it's less an issue, but I want to keep this thing pristine.<br><br>Great show, I recommend it to all my army buddies.<br><br>Ed]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward McNamara]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 12:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Podcast 158 - 10.06.2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/engadget-hd-podcast-158-10-06-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/engadget-hd-podcast-158-10-06-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just upgrade to a LED LCD and you will never have to worry for a second about burn-in.<br>the word on the streets :Burn-in, no good.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kevon27]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 12:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Podcast 158 - 10.06.2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/engadget-hd-podcast-158-10-06-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/engadget-hd-podcast-158-10-06-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great show ? NOT.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JayD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 5:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Podcast 158 - 10.06.2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/engadget-hd-podcast-158-10-06-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/engadget-hd-podcast-158-10-06-2009/</guid><description><![CDATA[The problem with 3D, from what some filmmakers were saying, is that it entirely changes how you shoot video.  The long "following" shots can make people sick in 3D, and you end up doing a lot more static camera stuff.  Think about this in sports.  Those wonderful cameras on the wires that follow the action around would, it seems, never be workable in 3D.  Too much movement.  Our brains don't mind it in 2D, but combining a moving camera and 3D messes our equilibrium up.<br><br>If this is all true, then I might actually prefer 2D with all the cool camera movement than a static 3D.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vance]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2009 6:34PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
