Pace and Rovi work together to make a standard set-top a true multi-room DVR

UPDATE - Pace announced deals with Buckeye Cablevision, Mediacom Communications, NCTC and Sunflower Broadband to deploy this.

The current crop of DC700X HD set-tops can already function as a dual-tuner DVR with the help of an external drive plugged into the eSATA port, but what Pace has done now is take it one big step further by releasing a MoCA 1.1 NAS. The way this would work is you'd order one of these from your cable company and then every DC700X set-top would use it instead of locally attached storage. What's even better is that with all the content stored on the network, all the shows will be available on any set-top in the house. Not only will you be able to resume the content, but each box works as a full blown dual tuner DVR, complete with dual live buffer functionality.
Now of couse there's a catch, with the worst one being that you'll have to wait on your provider to offer the NAS device, which assumes that your provider has an relationship with Pace -- currently this equipment only works on Motorola head-ends and although the boxes are tru2way ready, this solution doesn't use it. The first offering of the NAS will only be a 500 GB model, which is over double that of most cable provided DVRs. The NAS does feature an eSATA port, but it won't be enabled until next year. The other disappointment to us is that each set-top maintains its own scheduled recording list, so you'll have to resolve the conflicts yourself by walking to another room and if someone deletes a show, there is no way to un-delete it or even see who deleted it. Sure these could all be addressed in software, and a representative of the company did say it was on the radar.
Now although the NAS features built in MoCA, the set-tops only have an Ethernet port, so the provider will have to install a MoCA to Ethernet bridge behind each set-top -- this is much easier than running CAT5 cable to every TV, but will require yet another wall-wart for power. MoCA is fast, but it does have its limits and currently 1.1 can support about 175Mbps of throughput. We're told this works out to 9 simultaneous HD streams in the house. So you could be recording six HD shows at once while playing back three. Because of this, Pace says the sweet spot is three set-tops, but says there is no hard limit so add as many boxes as you want.
Although we wish these were available directly to consumers, we do see how this is also an attractive solution to cable providers. The big advantage to them is they no longer need to stock a DVR and a standard set top. Instead they use the same set-top for all deployments and just add the NAS when DVR functionality is needed. Hopefully since this benefits both the customer and the provider we'll see this offered by provider all over the country. Until then we'll have to stick to solutions like Media Center and TiVo which although doesn't have all the same benefits, it is available to anyone willing to pay extra for it.
Read - Pace Introduces First to Market Multiroom DVR Solution

















Looks like the future of cable co provided MRV DVR. Not quite a WMC (w/ extenders) killer but they're getting close to that "good enough" product. If the case of the missing extenders isn't solved soon, things like this will bury WMC's chances of becoming the defacto MRV solution for good.
It seems to me that if each STB is a dual tuner DVR, and they are all recording HD shows to the NAS, you are going to hit some limits real quick. I know MoCa 1.1 is rated at 175mbps, but anyone know some real world numbers? At a max of 20mbps for an MPEG-2 channel, you'd be limited to 4 STBs recording/buffering at once and that is assuming perfect conditions.
Plus with only 500GB that can get filled really quick.
My other concern would be the fact that if that NAS dies you lose all of your shows. I think I'd prefer individual DVRs that use cooperative scheduling & a combined list of shows.
175Mbps is the real world performance of 1.1, the theoretical is like 400 or something. 1.0 was 270Mbps, and I was able to easily send 100 Mbps across it and didn't have the equipment to try more (adapter had 10/100 Nics).
I agree that 500GB isn't big enough, but even if you had 3 stand-alone DVRs, you'd still only have 480GB (160x3).
Great Concept!
I bet it still uses that ugly, outdated I-Guide user interface. Time to step that up a bit, don't you think?
Looks like this isn't just some "vaporware" that will come out in 3 years, they are deploying these now (or at least they are finishing up testing them):
http://www.pace.com/corporate/mediahub/pacenewsitem.asp?id=10938
According to Pace they are "..available for immediate deployment."
While I don't have confirmation from Pace or Rovi on this yet, I am pretty sure that this is based on DLNA and uses DTCP-IP or WM-DRM for content protection. Therefore, there is a very real possibility that these DVRs (along with similar designs from other STB makers) will allow you to get at your pay TV programming from your PC or other secure DLNA video client.
I plan to put out a press release in a month or two once I'm further into my research on the topic, but yes there is a real chance that you're now witnessing the first stages of the liberation of your pay content on your home LAN.
--Stephen Froehlich, Sr. Analyst, IMS Research
Yes the release specifically mentions DLNA, UPnP and DTCP-IP. The problem of course is that streaming is one thing, copying is another and any content marked Copy Once still won't be able to be copied to a PC.