<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for OWC takes quad-interface Mercury Pro external BD burner to 12x</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for OWC takes quad-interface Mercury Pro external BD burner to 12x</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OWC takes quad-interface Mercury Pro external BD burner to 12x]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</guid><description><![CDATA[And what about internal? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 10:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OWC takes quad-interface Mercury Pro external BD burner to 12x]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</guid><description><![CDATA[That looks like in internal joint inside an external enclosure. Give me the internal so I don't have to pay for the enclosure!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Caprice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 10:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OWC takes quad-interface Mercury Pro external BD burner to 12x]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you don't want an external just buy the dang internal don't whine because OWC (which specializes in external drives) doesn't sell it.<br><br><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16827129051" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16827129051</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MacBandit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 1:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OWC takes quad-interface Mercury Pro external BD burner to 12x]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's likely either a Pioneer BDR-205 (which is 12X) or the new Lite-On which uses the same chipset.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 2:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OWC takes quad-interface Mercury Pro external BD burner to 12x]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</guid><description><![CDATA[All these speed boosts are useless when BD-RE is still only at 2x. Is any manufacturer actually working on 4x BD-RE???]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[theMediaman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 10:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OWC takes quad-interface Mercury Pro external BD burner to 12x]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bah, just buy more discs.  Just burn and forget and quit worrying about questionable data integrity with re-writable discs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MacBandit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 1:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OWC takes quad-interface Mercury Pro external BD burner to 12x]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</guid><description><![CDATA[can this run on a WHS (windows 2003) for ripping?<br>or does it have to be XP VISTA or WIN 7]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[raaaaaa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OWC takes quad-interface Mercury Pro external BD burner to 12x]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think you can actually burn at 12X on USB or Firewire. 1X is 36mbit/sec on Blu-ray, 12X would be 436mbit/sec continuous throughput, something USB will never manage. Firewire 400 won't either for sure, I guess Firewire 800 stands a chance if it is very, very efficient.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 1:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OWC takes quad-interface Mercury Pro external BD burner to 12x]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</guid><description><![CDATA[i thought usb 2 was 480mbps]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[glenn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 8:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OWC takes quad-interface Mercury Pro external BD burner to 12x]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/owc-takes-quad-interface-mercury-pro-external-bd-burner-to-12x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice, now sony region chiefs can send each other BD disks with stuff for when their drawer of sony memorysticks is empty.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 4:54PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
