<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for YouTube going 1080p, already?</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for YouTube going 1080p, already?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on YouTube going 1080p, already?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yea keyboard cat in 1080p!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2009 7:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on YouTube going 1080p, already?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</guid><description><![CDATA[Those GMA950s are gonna be all over it!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AndrewNoNumbers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2009 8:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on YouTube going 1080p, already?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</guid><description><![CDATA["look as good or better than the source quality." <br><br>Garbage In = Garbage out.<br><br>Plus, bitrate is just as important as resolution in this case.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[T-bone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2009 8:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on YouTube going 1080p, already?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</guid><description><![CDATA[Trying to watch HD on YouTube is a joke. You spend so much time trying to buffer the video that you just plain loose interest in watching it. I don't know if it's just my ISP playing around with my connection our YouTube needing to beef up it's infrastructure, but 1080p is just going to make the problem of HD video even worse for everyone.<br><br>Plus, who really has the screen resolution to actually use all 1080 pixels? Are they counting on the fact that because the bitrates are so low that 1080p from YouTube may finally outclass 720p with a decent bitrate? I'd rather they improve that than go adding pixels when they're really not needed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dagamer43]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2009 9:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on YouTube going 1080p, already?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</guid><description><![CDATA[My biggest gripe with Youtube's HD is that the video window never changes to actual resolution of the file that is being streamed. Most of the HD is 720, but the video window is at maximum 853x505. What kind of resolution is that? Other video sites do this and it tries me crazy. I often download the file with software or greasemonkey scripts to get 1:1 pixel. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IseWise]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2009 11:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on YouTube going 1080p, already?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</guid><description><![CDATA[Uh, not sure what you mean by "screen resolution" but I have a second monitor that's 1920x1200, so to answer your question, I have that resolution.  Several of my friends have that resolution.  In fact, MANY people have that resolution, so...what's your point?<br><br>"Better than the source quality" is almost complete rubbish.  Are they going to try and upscale iPhone 3Gs video to 1080 or even 720?  For the most part, upscaling doesn't work, so YouTube, just give up right now, and just keep the resolution and even bitrate just like the original and we can agree on that.  Okay?<br><br>-Brian]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Kaempen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2009 12:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on YouTube going 1080p, already?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah, only if your internet sucks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2009 1:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on YouTube going 1080p, already?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just checked <a href="http://www.recastdigital.net/DEMO/" rel="nofollow">http://www.recastdigital.net/DEMO/</a> and their HD video looks very good!!! No stopping all the time like youtube video.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2009 10:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on YouTube going 1080p, already?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</guid><description><![CDATA[I smell a PS3/360 client in the works youtube added h264 codec a few weeks prior to Apple putting youtube in the apple tv/iphone  and seeing this would make sense.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[theoneneo81]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2009 10:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on YouTube going 1080p, already?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</guid><description><![CDATA[Flash in 1080p? Suffer the CPUs.<br><br>When is the 10.1 beta finally going to be ready. I'm looking forward to this supposed performance increase.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[THizzle7XU]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2009 11:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on YouTube going 1080p, already?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</guid><description><![CDATA[why dont they use silverlight for this??? at least that offloads to the gpu and makes even netbooks able to watch 720p. flash is getting awfully long in the teeth compared to silverlight...and its awfully bloated]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2009 8:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on YouTube going 1080p, already?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</guid><description><![CDATA[Flash has something similar to the stuff silverlight can do but it does seem for some reason flash developers are not taking advantage.  Ive said it before but the smoothstreaming tech in silverlight is awesome.  All video online should use something similar.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2009 4:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on YouTube going 1080p, already?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/youtube-going-1080p-already/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hello:<br><br>A continuous battle is given between broadcasting communities which are now so popular and YouTube is now trying to achieve even better video quality to stay in front of the other competitors like Hulu. Facebook is moving fast also with it's viral power and recently closed a partnership with a streaming company. YouTube said they will go back and re-encode all previous videos uploaded at that resolution. They are not the first company to achieve that as previous releases have been already tested and released a few months ago. Here is an article talking about this technology with technical details for a better understanding: <a href="http://www.thehdstandard.com/hd-broadcaster/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thehdstandard.com/hd-broadcaster/</a><br>Indeed as Jeff previously commented I am curious how they will solve the buffering issues because I'm losing a lot of time trying to view a video encoded at that standard.<br>_______________________________________<br>Catalin<br>Streaming Consultant<br>www.eyepartner.com/presentation<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cata12]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 27th 2009 5:25AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
