<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for AT&amp;T U-verse now serving 2 million+</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/atandt-u-verse-now-serving-2-million/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for AT&amp;T U-verse now serving 2 million+</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T U-verse now serving 2 million+]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/atandt-u-verse-now-serving-2-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/atandt-u-verse-now-serving-2-million/</guid><description><![CDATA[Too bad it stops 400ft short of my house.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 3:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T U-verse now serving 2 million+]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/atandt-u-verse-now-serving-2-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/atandt-u-verse-now-serving-2-million/</guid><description><![CDATA[New 24mb speed doesn't seem to available in Houston, TX yet... price is not actually $65, it's actually $75 afaik. $65 is likely the promotional rate for 6 months or something (if added with TV and/or phone service)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[quick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 4:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T U-verse now serving 2 million+]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/atandt-u-verse-now-serving-2-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/atandt-u-verse-now-serving-2-million/</guid><description><![CDATA[At the rate they're expanding, it should get to my Los Angeles neighborhood by 2017 or so.  Of course, by that time, I'll have moved to someplace I can get Fios.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kcmurphy88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 4:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T U-verse now serving 2 million+]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/atandt-u-verse-now-serving-2-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/atandt-u-verse-now-serving-2-million/</guid><description><![CDATA[and I'm limited to 3Mb for the foreseeable future.<br><br>*sigh*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nrb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 6:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T U-verse now serving 2 million+]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/atandt-u-verse-now-serving-2-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/atandt-u-verse-now-serving-2-million/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just got this 5 days ago, and so far everything is going great. I'm also feeling its UI compared to Directvs. Speed is a pro since I used to live way too far for DSL (extra 10,000 ft further)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lpfan3013]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 7:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T U-verse now serving 2 million+]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/atandt-u-verse-now-serving-2-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/atandt-u-verse-now-serving-2-million/</guid><description><![CDATA[Opposing report:<br><br>I live in an AT&T neighborhood. I reside 30-40 miles outside of Atlanta, Georgia in a county with 750,000 residents. I live in a middle income neighborhood within walking distances of neighborhoods from starter homes to luxury homes.<br><br>No U-verse for us, not now nor anytime soon. Not even when several company employees reside here, too. Makes not a bit of difference that we have Ma Bell fiber running up and down our streets (IFITL platform). AT&T (ahem, SBC) just doesn't care one bit.<br><br>Now add to the fact that they are over-compressing their h.264 video streams for HD and you have to ask yourself why would you ever bother with them? Not even if you work for them.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BarkingGhost]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 5:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T U-verse now serving 2 million+]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/atandt-u-verse-now-serving-2-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/atandt-u-verse-now-serving-2-million/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br>Because it beats the hell out of cable providers.  Especially Time Warner which is a PoS that hasn't innovated in a decade and leaves us without NFL Network/Redzone or a cavalcade of HD channels unlike Uverse.  As soon as it hits my building I'm signing up even if it's more expensive.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boilerdown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 8:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T U-verse now serving 2 million+]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/atandt-u-verse-now-serving-2-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/atandt-u-verse-now-serving-2-million/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've had this for a few months now. That "box" is about 3 blocks away. But I am still limited to only 1 HD channel at a time. After bouncing around on their telephone support lines for about an hour (major hot-potato scenario), I finally spoke to a techie who told me the bandwidth to my house isn't sufficient for "profile A" and that I was on "profile B". My router shows 19.2Mbps coming into the router, so I don't get it. This is my biggest complaint at this point, especially after all their ads harp on multiple HD channels. Frankly, it sucks...<br><br>I also have not been able to figure out how to get a button on that remote to put my name-brand TV into "sleep mode". But maybe that's just me being a moron...<br><br>I also see frequent blips similar to what one would see on a YouTube video when the bandwidth is barely sufficient. I wonder what that's all about...<br><br>The multi-room DVR feature is FANTASTIC! Can even watch HD movies on the SD TV (it must refactor the images).<br><br>From a technology stand point, I like the way they have this set up. It's a LAN that can be extended over existing twisted pair, existing coax, plus wireless. The installer replaced my LinkSYS router with this fancy new modem/router that has several connections of various types on the back. He connected my existing coax runs to each TV, my existing Cat-5 runs to my computers and I was set in about an hour. Slick... And that's why that multi-room DVR thing works so well...<br><br>I do have a nice fat 6MB internet connection too. Wow...<br><br>I was a DirecTV subscriber for 10 years and am a huge fan of this company and their technology. But in order to hook up my new HD TV, I had to buy a new box and a new dish. The box was included with U-verse signup. And when I asked them about multi-room DVR, they said it was too confusing. I'm guessing it's because they don't have the network setup that U-Verse does... no LAN, just raw signal to the back of the TV converter box. And the real deal breaker was that DirecTV Internet service is a lousy value for an urban-dweller. Oh well, so long DirecTV... it was great while it lasted.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JeffThurston]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2009 12:42PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
