<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Bourne DVD / Blu-ray combo boxes are incredibly descriptive</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Bourne DVD / Blu-ray combo boxes are incredibly descriptive</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bourne DVD / Blu-ray combo boxes are incredibly descriptive]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</guid><description><![CDATA[Are they going to offer JUST the Blu-Ray version so I don't have to pay for both versions?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ack154]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 4:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bourne DVD / Blu-ray combo boxes are incredibly descriptive]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ack154 No. There is no reason to. It won't cost you anymore. The MSRP is no higher than any other BD release. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 4:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bourne DVD / Blu-ray combo boxes are incredibly descriptive]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)<br><br>I'll believe it when I see it. I just refuse to believe that the idea of writing another version of the movie on the other side of a special disc does NOT give the movie studios an excuse to charge a premium for it. Even if it's just another $1, that's too much.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ack154]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 7:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bourne DVD / Blu-ray combo boxes are incredibly descriptive]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think it *can* be more expensive.  The damned Bourne Trilogy is probably the most overpriced Blu-ray set on the Internet.  The new Harry Potter FIVE movies are cheaper than the THREE Bourne movies on Amazon.<br><br>It would certainly be nice if this technology worked better this time around (even HD-DVD die hards hated the flippers)...<br><br>But I can't help to think they're a bit late here.  The uptick in Blu-ray player sales, and the expected Christmas rush on BD (and HDTVs) means we're headed Blu-ray.  Compatibility with older DVD players is nice -- us poor, pathetic Mac users -- but it's becoming less and less an issue as Blu-ray share grows.<br><br>-Pie]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EatingPie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 5:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bourne DVD / Blu-ray combo boxes are incredibly descriptive]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</guid><description><![CDATA[1.  Those boxes are hideous, so at least the sides better be nice.<br>2.  Did Universal re-encode these to take better advantage of the 50GB disc?  I hate when I read that studios recycled the encode from HD-DVD as I highly doubt studios are deleting these movies of their hard drives somewhere and that for a studio/pro-house, a blu-ray encode could be completed overnight or over a weekend at the most.<br>3.  @EatingPie, I feel you Mac pain, that's why I finally caved and just got a dedicated player for my new TV and stopped worrying about my Cinema Display and HDCP.<br><br>-Brian]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Kaempen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bourne DVD / Blu-ray combo boxes are incredibly descriptive]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</guid><description><![CDATA[Combination boxes are stupid. Its nothing more than a marketing ploy to force BD buyers to pay more. BD players can be had regularly for under $100. Anyone buying BD can afford a sub-$100 BD player and never need a DVD-only player. And I doubt DVD-only households are looking to buy BD movie combo boxes when they can't afford the sub-$100 BD player.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BarkingGhost]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 5:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bourne DVD / Blu-ray combo boxes are incredibly descriptive]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</guid><description><![CDATA[Didn't we already learn this lesson with the flippable widescreen/P&S discs in the early days of DVDs? People would much rather have printed artwork and two discs in the package.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Wardell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 8:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bourne DVD / Blu-ray combo boxes are incredibly descriptive]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</guid><description><![CDATA[$25 a movie is my guess]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall Lind]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 1:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bourne DVD / Blu-ray combo boxes are incredibly descriptive]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</guid><description><![CDATA[I got the boxset which is good and i dont care for dvd since all i buy is blu ray also i could care less for digital copies which take up to a 1.2 gb of space when i had my ipod touch . If i was to use the digital copie disc it would be for my zune hd if and when they do start that .]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shamon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 2:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bourne DVD / Blu-ray combo boxes are incredibly descriptive]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/bourne-dvd-blu-ray-combo-boxes-are-incredibly-descriptive/</guid><description><![CDATA[Rather have BD and an HD version for the PC or portable player.<br><br>On the other hand, if people REALLY don't like the double-sided discs, maybe I can get these for $5 at Big Lots next year. :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 10:15PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
