<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[But do they still have burn in? ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 3:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@CBHorn Haven't had for several years.<br><br><a href="http://hdguru.com/plasma-tv-burn-in-fact-or-myth/826/" rel="nofollow">http://hdguru.com/plasma-tv-burn-in-fact-or-myth/826/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AndyS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 3:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder if the '09 comparison display was brand new or work horse  they shuttle around to various trade shows.  Black levels and contrast ratios seem to get significantly worse with hour of use on these Panasonics:  <a href="http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/forumdisplay.php?f=167" rel="nofollow">http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/forumdisplay.php?f=167</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reallink]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@CBHorn <br><br>Thanks for the down-ranking, but my comment was sarcasm, hence the wink.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 4:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Reallink  Woops, above is wrong link: <a href="http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1167339" rel="nofollow">http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1167339</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reallink]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 4:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@CBHorn perhaps you should use /s versus the ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 6:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is that  V or G line tv?<br><br>I wonder if they are going to fix the 24fps playback with the G20 and G25 line.  If so I might just wait to get one of those if the price is right.  I am really wanting to get a V10, but 2k for a TV is a really hard sell to the wife.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfWho]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 3:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[The V10 is nowhere as good as 1st gen Kuro although it is the closest TV to Kuro.  This version, at best is equal to 1st gen Kuro... which is only 20% as black as the 2nd gen Kuro.<br><br>It's still a loooooong way to go, Panny.  Maybe next year or the year after, but not this year.  Not yet. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Susilo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 4:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@David Susilo <br><br>kuro engineer's are also behind panny's 2010 models,<br>so i doubt it'll take that long, and yes actually the 2010 models are black as 2nd gen kuro elites]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wanted to upgrade to a 58" V10 but burn in scared me & my bank account silly after seeing burn in on a 42" Hitachi Plasma the in-laws got. Made me stay on my 52" Samsung A750 with the only hopes of upgrading being to a Samsung 52" B750, which is somewhat silly.<br><br>If someone with a rep & experience told me that the Panny's had no issue with any burn-in, and or video gaming, maybe I could see it as a future upgrade option.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnny Neat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 4:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <a href="http://hdguru.com/plasma-tv-burn-in-fact-or-myth/826/" rel="nofollow">http://hdguru.com/plasma-tv-burn-in-fact-or-myth/826/</a><br><br>Comparing a Hitachi to a Panasonic is not really a fair comparison too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfWho]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 5:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) I've got a year old Panasonic plasma and haven't babied it at all and have no burn in.  It will occasionally get image retention if I leave the Xbox on the dashboard for awhile, but as soon as I watch regular TV it goes away.<br><br>Burn in from anywhere near to normal use is not a problem.  FUD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AndyS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 7:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) I have my own 2007 Panny Plasma, and it has no issues with burn in whatsoever. I have a PS3 and Tivo, both of which can leave "burn in" on TVs, but neither one has even left the slightest hint of it at all.<br><br>My friend has a Panny Plasma (previous year to mine) and his kids play Wii on it all the time - no issues there, either.<br><br>Fact is, these days at least, burn in is not a problem anymore. Maybe the Hitachi has some sensitive panel (as the previous poster said, it's not a fair comparison anyway)... but plenty of articles prove that there's no burn in anymore:<br><a href="http://hdguru.com/plasma-tv-burn-in-fact-or-myth/826/" rel="nofollow">http://hdguru.com/plasma-tv-burn-in-fact-or-myth/826/</a><br><a href="http://broadcastengineering.com/hdtv/Plasma-burn-in-20050817/" rel="nofollow">http://broadcastengineering.com/hdtv/Plasma-burn-in-20050817/</a><br><a href="http://www.electronichouse.com/article/the_myth_of_plasma_burn_in/C155" rel="nofollow">http://www.electronichouse.com/article/the_myth_of_plasma_burn_in/C155</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Schwinn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2010 8:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[Kuro's are soooo 2008... time to move on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kevon27]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 4:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ProfWho  Read that article before and in there it mentions how aspect ratio watching of a certain type for days can result in burn-in, which is what happened. I was completely inexperienced in Plasma tech at the time and they wouldn't know any better, but they have burn-in from months of watching a hunting channel in 4:3. <br><br>I feel bad about it, but they have Sears' protection plan and from experience Sears' is good at taking care of issues. So I hope I can in the end upgrade them to something less worrisome, like say an LCD. That way I won't have to babysit their set & watching habits. What a shame though, still puts the fear in me sadly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnny Neat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 5:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) I do think if you are dealing with parents who abuse their sets (and eyes) by watching almost nothing but 4:3 content, I would agree that a LCD would be a good choice.  <br><br>Out of curiosity though, what picture setting do your parents have the set at?  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfWho]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 5:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ProfWho - I gave them their settings off of www.Avsforum.com user calibrations for the set. Set looks good but I guess it's not the best quality, of course. Still I think this is a serious thing against Plasma. I mean there are enough people out there that don't think one way or another about what aspect they are watching, HD or not and or baby their tech. I think this is a huge hurdle for any tech. Plasma has to overcome this issue.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnny Neat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 15th 2010 9:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is it not possible that the 2010 Panasonic's are using the Kuro technology?  Pioneer isn't using it anymore.  We might be looking at Kuro clones!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 6:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TRT <br>They've cherry picked what makes sense.  Obviously they're using what they were already manufacturing for Pio, but not what was unique to Pio's Elite series.   I believe this includes "deep-encased cell structure", the screen filters & coatings and their picture processing.<br><br>However, the Z1 does appear to use the same coatings and forgo the protective glass, as does the samsung B860 plasma.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[clara]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 7:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@clara  <br><br>A Pioneer branded Panasonic plasma never came off the assembly line. Pioneer pulled the plug before it even began. If there was a 2009 Kuro it would've been made by Panasonic. So the 2007 and 2008 Kuros were always made by Pioneer. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 7:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does the VT25-Series handle Blu-ray 3D in a correct way, without 3:2-pulldown? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Addex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 6:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[Those photos don't seem to reveal than big difference of contrast but I'm pretty sure that a true review would reveal them. Kuro's are so 2008? Well that's strange when in 2010 they still give something to talk about anywhere someone reviewes a new HDTV. So 2008 but hell, they seem to have left such a mark in the videophile world. Oh, sorry..I know that almost everyone loves silly 3D, thin displays and super bright inaccurate colours. As a happy owner of a 9G Kuro, gotta tell you Panny, you better do something with their magic sauce! I trust you :) Nop, zero burn in my friends (even with PC usage)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darth cardo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2010 11:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[zero difference with these photos, defeats the post!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2010 12:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[Those photos don't seem to me so different. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darkhan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2010 2:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[Kuros are not only about black levels. They also offer processing and display features that no one else does, like 75/100 Hz display for even the NA models (the KRP-500 can do all of 60/72/75/100 Hz) for watching smooth 25/50p content. Also, I don't think the Panasonics (or anyone else?) has reverse pulldown to convert 1080/60i or 720/60p streams into 1080/24p for film content. Works wonders on ATSC HDTV.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2010 5:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok gang, here is a question. Would you wait to get a TV that was announced at CES 2010 or get a still available Pioneer KURO PDP-6020FD before they are all gone?<br><br>I am replacing a 4 year old 720p Samsung Plasma and I am on the fence here. I mainly use it for OTA TV and some Xbox 360 (I have a separate projection theater for movies).<br><br>I see some authorized resellers of the KRUO have a some left in stock. Should I jump on the KRUO or wait? Thoughts?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Balloondoggies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2010 8:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) ok, it appears I can only spell KURO once per post..DOH]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Balloondoggies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2010 8:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  <br><br>Get the Kuro, it's still the de-facto comparison standard by various reviewers and magazines around the world]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Susilo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2010 9:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) if you have the cash go fot the Elite version of the Kuro, otherwise the 6020FD is going to serve you extremeley well...great contrast, amazing resolution and zero image retention...what more can you ask from the current state of the art of HDTVs? they're so 2008? who cares! no one beats them still in 2010!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darth cardo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2010 12:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DarthCardo  <br><br>Thanks for the tip, the problem is finding a new Elite to purchase, the online places I have checked don't have any left.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Balloondoggies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2010 12:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  <br><br>Elites are not sold online.  If you buy it online, that means it's a grey market hence you won't get any pioneer warranty.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Susilo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2010 3:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@David Susilo  <br><br>Well that would explain the lack of Elites online. Thanks!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Balloondoggies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2010 3:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br><br>you should wait, never pay money for a discontinued product, something else will come and take over, Panny is going to be the new Kuro, literally.<br>same technology soon.<br><br>besides 3D is the new in technology]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2010 12:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Kyu  <br>It is hard to wait when TVs released years later still aren't up to the same level of perfection as the KUROs. I got a PRO-141FD, I have had it on the wall for 3 weeks now, I wish I would have pulled the trigger earlier, it is wonderful.<br><br>Also, I couldn't care less about 3D, I want this fad to die a horrible death as it already has many times over the last 60 years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Balloondoggies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 18th 2010 9:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[What are the model numbers for the 2010 Panasonic plasmas?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cre8tive]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2010 11:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well just purchased the PRO-141FD. <br><br>I can't WAIT to get it on the wall!<br><br>Thanks for the input.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Balloondoggies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 12th 2010 4:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[Search Youtube for <br><br>SOMEONE IS ANGRY AT PANASONIC<br><br>In case this link is blocked.<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xE3Mp89xHOg" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xE3Mp89xHOg</a><br><br>Your best source for info is AVSFORUM if you want to know OWNERS opinions.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bervick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 2nd 2010 12:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's 2010 plasma line has much better black levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/panasonics-2010-plasma-line-has-much-better-black-levels/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Bervick <br>lol at the link.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[muadib]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2010 5:51PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
