Extenders for Media Center aren't dead, they just seem like it



What Microsoft could do instead of making another Extender platform.
Of course we've been wrong before and based on the level of a disappointment in the first two generations of Extenders -- for manufactures and consumers alike -- it isn't too crazy to think that everyone has had enough. If this is truly the case, there're a few ways this could end up. One possible route would be for Microsoft to give up on its RDP protocol as a foundation and go with a standard instead. Microsoft has already adopted DLNA in a big way in Windows 7, and that spec happens to include a remote user interface protocol. But some say that protocol couldn't do justice to Media Center's rich 3D interface, which is why the RVU alliance built its own remote UI protocol on top of DLNA. So if Microsoft added an RVU server to Windows 7, then instead of building its own Extender platform it could just leach off of it. This would enable new HDTVs from Samsung and Sony -- due to support RVU this year -- to work as Extenders. And of course Linksys or HP could still make a media streamer with an RVU client built in. And with many new Blu-ray players featuring DLNA clients, even disc players could get in on the fun. This seems like an ideal solution, but we're making a big assumption that the RVU experience would be a good one. Because one thing is for sure, with the 360 selling for $200, if the experience isn't every bit as good, no one will buy it.

What if Extenders are dead?
The other possible scenario of course is that Extenders are just dead. The problem with this theory is that while a full blown Media Center PC can do lots of things Extenders can't, for those who use Media Center as a DVR, there are plenty of things a PCs can't do either. Now no one outside of Redmond really understand why a Media Center PC can't do everything an Extender can -- commonly referred to as softsled -- but the fact is that currently there are a few big drawbacks of using a PC as an extender. The biggest problem being that a copy protected recording on one PC can't be played back on another. But even if you're lucky enough to have all unprotected content, multiple Media Center PCs still can't participate in a whole home DVR. What we mean is that there's no conflict resolution and there are multiple Scheduled Recordings lists. This means that if you scheduled Lost to record in the bedroom and you don't have enough tuners on that PC to also record the Olympics, you'll have to walk into the other room to leverage another tuner in the living room to resolve the conflict. There are also some problems resuming content in another room, but we don't pretend to know what they are exactly as we haven't tested it very extensively. Luckily HomeGroup does make it easy to have a single Recorded TV list, but as TiVo owners will tell you, that alone is a long way from a true whole house DVR.

Never say never.
So yeah, no one really knows how this is going to play out, but with only a few months since the release of Windows 7, and without Microsoft saying otherwise, claiming that Extenders are dead is just premature. We do believe there is a market for Extenders both stand-alone and built into other devices like TVs and Blu-ray players, but without support for just about everything a Media Center PC can do and at a great price, there really isn't much of a point so why bother?





















Its kind of a tough spot right now. Although cable-card tuners from Haupauge and Ceton are coming out that look to make things easier for the vast majority of cable subscribers, no one really knows how its gonna play out. And those Ceton cards alone are expensive! Never mind the extenders. While all of this is supposed to be happening later this year, Cablelabs is currently coming up with a cable-card replacement. I do think we will see something around Fall though, and just shot in the dark but I think MS is gonna integrate Natal into the WMC component of the xbox for windows 7. We know WMC supports some nice touchscreen features, but we haven't seen one device that uses it yet. (I am thinking the HP Slate might use this too).
We have 4 extenders in the house and love them. There are times that we'd like to watch Hulu or Netflix from an extender, but they are rare occurrences.
The main asset with an extender is that it is the ONLY solution in a kitchen right now. Ben Reed said to me, with a straight face, that my friends should put XBox360s in their kitchen as extenders. To put it simply, this won't happen.
The Extender concept isn't just some ancillary afterthought, it is the CRUX of Media Center's future success. A DVR solution from here out HAS to do whole house, or it will die. Therefore I think that Microsoft MUST be doing some RVU Alliance compatible thing or something very similar. Right? RIGHT?!!! Sigh - Microsoft has let us down so many many times, though, so why should I expect them to actually excel with a product that is just ALMOST capable of completely taking over the home entertainment market?
(ie if you are reading, MS, get your heads up, and connect these platforms!!! If I own a Zune, a Sync-enabled car, a Media Center, and a Zune Pass account, I should be able to play ZunePass music through Media Center, use the Sync system one of my Zune-DRM devices (synced over my wifi when the car is in the garage), and offload DRM'd Media Center Recorded TV to up to 3 Zune devices, This total Zune experience would absolutely blow Apple and TiVo out of the water. It's just incredible that Microsoft cannot connect these obvious dots)
I've been thinking that the "extender" as a client only (or primary) machine may indeed be dead at this point. Maybe the answer is more of a stand alone box that works without requiring the host PC if you don't have it, or hooks into 7MC as an extender if you do.
Seems there's money in set top boxes, as the rush to market of devices like the Boxee Box, Popcorn Hour stuff, Roku, etc show. MS could leverage ties with Netflix, Amazon, last.fm, flickr, facebook, etc to make the box perfectly functional on it's own, but also works great as an extender. Broad codec support so you can stream media or play from attached USB device, etc. DLNA support, etc.
Basically a more media focused and cheaper 360.
I just don't think average people "get" extenders. The 360 is a gamer Trojan horse for Media Center, maybe they need one for non-gamers, too.
@andysexton Oh, and I had one of those big ol' Linksys extenders for MC2005.
@andysexton
This whole issue should be moot. The only "extender" anyone should need (or really want) at this point should be a Revo running MCE in "frontend mode". Is there not such a thing for MCE?
Don't forget the new version of Windows Home Server!!! It's possible that they will be adding some Media Center stuff to that! Maybe Media Center Extenders after they come out with the new Home Server?
@bguy1986 Beat me to it. From everything I've heard (sadly, none confirmed, of course) WHS2 is going to have a media center in it. That only makes sense IMO if we're going to see more extenders. If WHS is morphed into a home entertainment hub, MS gets a distinct product with which to market WMC, and I think that alone would be a big plus for them. Right now it's yet another feature in Windows, and so no one focuses on it when they talk about Windows. But as a main feature of WHS, it's win win. You get to push WHS, and you get to push WMC at the same time.
@bguy1986 The beta of the new Windows Home Server (Vail) that leaked last week had no new media center integration compared to WHS power pack 3.
Don't forget the new version of Windows Home Server!!! It's possible that they will be adding some Media Center stuff to that! Maybe Media Center Extenders after they come out with the new Home Server?
After what MS did with Windows Phone 7, anything can happen :)
I have a couple extenders in my home right now that I'm very satisfied with. The only upgrades they could possibly add are Flash/Silverlight support and support for a few more codecs? This isn't substantial enough to warrant a new platform.
Sure, it would be great to have identical functionality on an extender as on a full fledged PC, but this kind of improvement is only marginal. While it gives more casual WMC users the ability to stream Netflix natively, it still doesn't give people Hulu like they would like. Hulu is only supported in WMC through a UI shortcuts to IE or HuluDesktop. But you can currently watch Netflix, Hulu and any other web based video source on your extenders today through PlayOn media server with the vmcPlayIt plugin.
I've had great results with Playon/PlayIt. I've sidestepped codec issues with DVRMSToolbox (and a lot of tinkering). I have everything I want right now.
The only groundbreaking improvement MS could make it to make the extender an embedded feature in more home theater products, as you outlined. I'm intrigued and excited about that theory. I'm trying not to get my hopes up though.
I can't see third parties sinking any more cash into extenders, the market is just too small. Anyone who runs Media Center extensively enough to warrant an extender probably already has a 360 in place to act as an extender. And how can a third party beat a tri-core Xeon box with a heavy-duty (relatively) gfx card for $200?
For the record, I use a 360 as my primary extender.
BINGO! There is no way Linksys/Cisco, Dlink, or anyone else can compete pricewise with a subsidized gaming console that also has the best Media Center Extender experience (GUI wise). The only disadvantage to the XBOX360 is noise...and even that is better with the latest XBOXs. I can barely hear my 360 Elite downstairs and the Halo 3 Edition XBOX in the bedroom isn't intolerably loud in extender (louder than I would prefer though).
I think Microsoft needs to produce an XBOX360-lite minus the optical and hard disk (just a little bit of flash memory to hold the Extender and the NetFlix code), maybe underclock the CPU (since it won't be playing games) to help with cooling. Or give us softsled and let us use a low-power / slient PC (Atom/ION2, or low-end AMD, or Core i3 with integrated graphics) platform as an extender.
You can have all the power of the 360 3 CPU's+GPU and I'll take a silent $100 set top box with a H264 decoder chip that is way more powerful than a 360 in video playback.
All the 360 video playback is done in software, that why it can't play back a full bluray rip while a cheap popbox can...
The 360 could if MS decides to rewrite 4.7 million lines of code...
http://blogs.msdn.com/xboxteam/archive/2006/11/03/emergence-day.aspx
@Alton I see your point, but video playback isn't my issue. I like the 360 because it can handle all the 3D stuff and neat faded overlays throughout Media Center. The kind of stuff that can't be done in software - not easily at least. IMHO it is worth the extra $100 but I know that isn't the case for everyone.
@Alton That's great but the way Media Center is architected there is no way to make that box for $100.00 and be able to support it, and be able to make a profit on it.
Got excited when I read the headline for this post but my dreams were shattered again - however just the fact there is speculation keeps the hopes up..
Today is especially important to me as it is the day i removed the SKY noose from around my next or should that be safety blanket. I have now moved 100% media center... are you impressed Ben?? It took 25mins to cancel my sky... the operator had no chance of finding ways to keep me when my answers to his begging are its free and true multiroom experience..!!!
Just hope it doesn't let me down as I won't be able to stand nagging.
However i am £65/mth better off now... !! Well very soon anyway..
Btw..
I use Media Center, XBOX 360 and 2 x Linksys DMA2100 extenders..
The DMA's are silent and great if just for watching TV. perfect for bed or kitchen..
I also think that Media Center needs an extender model of some sort to realise its true potential.. otherewise the true multiroom experience is a pipe dream :-(
I had my Media Center connected directly to my home theater for awhile but after getting an Xbox 360 Arcade very cheap, there's no going back for me.
As much as it would be awesome, I doubt that Microsoft would go RVU. When have they ever payed attension to standards?
With a Win7 media center, can you add storage for the DVR function with external USB HDDs or do they have to be internal SATA drives?
@GlobalCop I'm hoping so! I recently bought a 2 terabyte Toshiba hard drive and had problems with it constantly going to sleep. Even when I set windows to not let my drives sleep, it still would go to sleep.. Then eventually it quit waking up. I sent it back but will be buying a 2 terabyte Fantom Drive. My understanding from what I've heard is that the Fantom drives don't go to sleep unless you set windows to sleep them. Otherwise the Fantom external drives should work well for DVR storage.
@GlobalCop I just reread what you wrote and now realize your question wasn't about whether or not if SATA drives would work. USB should in theory should have enough bandwidth since it can carry up to 480 mbps.. The average dtv television signal can be up to 19 megabit's per second. I would think USB should be sufficient, but I still don't trust that it would be reliable, so I'm certainly going eSata.
@GlobalCop Unless something has changed, Media Center only allows you to define one specific folder location to store your recordings. So if you have multiple drives, you will have to manually move recordings to the added storage (or schedule the use of an external script) and then add those drives as Watched Folders within Media Center.
I would gladly avoid all this obsolete-on-arrival nonsense with extenders and find some sort of alternative solution. I'm imagining the Boxee Box accessing my Media Center recordings that are moved to a NAS. Boxee/XBMC can play recordings now, but subtitles/close captioning and meta data is not yet supported. Next, create a client on the Boxee Box to access guide data and set up recordings on Media Center. I believe this has been done before through web clients. Finally, with the use of network tuners such as SiliconDust's HDHomerun and upcoming CableCard version, we can stream live TV directly to the Boxee Box without even needing Media Center to be on, though you will lose out on DVR features and encrypted channels.
@badbob001 Or you could just use an extender.
@smcdonald248 I got burned when my V1 extenders didn't work with the upgrade to Vista. Should I need to spend almost a thousand dollars for basically a codec update every time Windows has an upgrade?
Anyone looking for the mega-corps to provide Extender functionality need look no further than SageTV. SageTV is everything and more that I had hoped and dreamed WMC would develop into. With SageTV I now have H.264 and 1080 in Every room in my house and the customization options are limitless.
Why doesn't MS allow any Win7 PC to become an extender its self? Granted you can pull a recorded show across the network through another WMC instance, but watching the Olympics LIVE on my Netbook in bed through a tuner in the main unit? Wouldn't that be nice?
WMC is an amazing program and I believe its way under rated. MS would be wise to add the MC functions to Windows Home Server and then support DLNA/RVU or some standard so it could work on other set-top boxes or TVs themselves as other have suggested here.
I've gone 100% with two 360s as extenders and both are used for gaming as well. I've switched from iTunes to Zune and that makes the experience even sweeter.
If they can connect a few more links of the chain together it will be a nice ecosystem...
I have three 360 extenders in my home just using OTA ATSC, and it has been an awesome way to centralize the DVR. There is more than enough to watch, and the WAF is great (the kids love it too). I hope the extender stays alive and well, as there just isn't anything out there that's as good at such a good price. I can see MS wanting a piece of the TV app integration market, so maybe there is a glimmer of hope.
I think that Ben is right that MS is lining some new extenders. They are revamping RDP to support more video/audio in Server 2008 R2 SP1 (so maybe the next WHS?) and Windows 7 SP1.
http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization/archive/2010/03/18/Explaining-Microsoft-RemoteFX.aspx