<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for The Masters in 3D will require you to manually select side by side</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for The Masters in 3D will require you to manually select side by side</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Masters in 3D will require you to manually select side by side]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't know about you, but I just plan to watch it that way on my non-3D TV and cross my eyes. ;)<br><br>But no, it sort of sucks that it's this way, since that'll obviously cut the horizontal resolution in half, but hey, better than nothing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe H]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 7th 2010 7:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Masters in 3D will require you to manually select side by side]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jhoff80 As long as you can watch it on a screen that's a few inches wide, you can diverge your eyes to see 3D. I saw these images on engadget in 3D that way. Sucks as a way to watch TV tho.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ariel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2010 1:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Masters in 3D will require you to manually select side by side]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</guid><description><![CDATA[They should just do what Colbert did and flicker between 2 cameras.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[engadgetcomexcludeengadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2010 2:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Masters in 3D will require you to manually select side by side]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</guid><description><![CDATA[Unfortunately these images aren't formatted for cross-eyed viewing, but rather parallel viewing, which I am having the hardest time to get myself to snap into 3D. (I tried it on the online webcast), either I need to figure out how to do Parallel viewing or someone needs to release a cross-eyed version.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Will]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 7th 2010 10:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Masters in 3D will require you to manually select side by side]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</guid><description><![CDATA[@shorties <br>I can not get the cross-eye thingy going, at all. But I have no problem at all with the parallel method. Just gaze at the picture, relax your eyes and let them drift like you're falling asleep. Then, when the two images overlap, focus.<br><br>The problem I have with the cross-eyes storage is that it puts the left image on the right, and the right image on the left. How illogical.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian Wolff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2010 12:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Masters in 3D will require you to manually select side by side]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder how poor the resolution of the 3-D broadcast will look in actuality.  (We already know it's cut in half horizontally, but how will that translate?)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2010 8:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Masters in 3D will require you to manually select side by side]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Biggiesized <br><br>I saw the demo of DirecTV's side by side and it looked great. It look so good that most came away wondering why all DirecTV's HD didn't look that good.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2010 8:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Masters in 3D will require you to manually select side by side]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</guid><description><![CDATA[Face the facts, 3D at home sucks. Who exactly wants to give up widescreen viewing and resolution for this trash?  What a waste of time.  Pass the one pair of glasses around! <br><br>How about we try to get every channel in HD first?  Luckily consumers are stupid.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gorgula]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2010 12:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Masters in 3D will require you to manually select side by side]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Gorgula My sentiments exactly. There's still way too much SD programming out there to be talking about a new technology that requires the purchase of a new television.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheBrizz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2010 4:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Masters in 3D will require you to manually select side by side]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/the-masters-in-3d-will-require-you-to-manually-select-side-by-si/</guid><description><![CDATA[3d is about the only way you would ever catch me watching golf on tv. i want a green/cup cam thou where the ball is coming right at the camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stub2k2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2010 1:30AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
