Google TV: Who is the competition and what are they saying about it?
The Google TV has landed and is already sending ripples through the marketplace, but what about all the companies already blending internet and TV? Whether they are already planning to work with the new initiative (Rovi), even more firmly staking a claim on their existing technology and vision for the connected TV (Microsoft, Yahoo), sounding like it's an option for the future (Samsung, VIZIO, Boxee) or already working on their own Android on TV projects (People of Lava, MIPS) each one should tell a little bit about where this market is headed in the coming months and years. Read on for their statements -- and a quick breakdown of what each is bringing to the table in case you weren't already running a network cable to your HDTV years ago.
Update: Now with reactions from Roku and PlayOn!
Boxee:
There's a lot of love going around for Boxee, and its CEO Avner Ronen has long promoted the merger of content from internet and traditional TV sources, if he can get access for the XBMC spinoff. This is what he posted to his twitter after the announcement.
The standalone streamer box has crept out of its shell as primarily a Netflix machine by partnering with MLB.tv and Amazon VOD. Being able to work with many different providers and having a low cost hardware platform could work greatly in its favor.
This piece of media streaming software has served to bring some of the internet's most liked and least flexible content to TV connected streamers for the last few years. If there's a way around a Hulu block for Google TV or anyone else slow to write an app, it's likely to be PlayOn.
Update: Now with reactions from Roku and PlayOn!
Boxee:

Microsoft:Watched the Google TV demo. more complementary than competitive. we should start working on Boxee Android App for TV... :) - Avner Ronen

Microsoft needs little introduction here, from the Web TV to today's Windows 7 Media Center, Mediaroom (used by AT&T's U-verse service), Xbox 360, Zune and most recently an embedded Media Center edition that could run directly on TVs and set-top boxes it's been working to connect the larger PC and internet experience to the television for quite some time.
Yahoo:"Microsoft has been in the smart TV space for a number of years and has strong partnerships with operators, OEMs and content partners across the industry and around the world. The company remains focused on delivering the best connected TV and entertainment experiences through a combination of great software plus services pulling information from the cloud, where content flows seamlessly from screen to screen on any device. We're already seeing much of this happening today. For example, Microsoft is enabling TV service providers to deliver these scenarios with Microsoft Mediaroom, the world's most deployed IPTV platform, powering award-winning TV services to close to 5 million households via 25 operator partners around the world. Mediaroom also enables TV service providers to deploy applications that can bring video and Web content together in ways that are specifically designed for enjoying and interacting via the TV and a remote control. Mediaroom customer, AT&T U-verse TV, has deployed over 20 interactive TV applications to date. Some example applications are highlighted at http://www.microsoft.com/mediaroom/Themes/Applications.aspx.
Another example is Windows Media Center which is focused on enabling new broadcast and internet TV content experiences on the PC for more than 25 million users around the world. Smart features like the integrated TV guide bring broadcast and internet TV channels in one place. Further, Microsoft is also delivering web and TV- integrated digital and social entertainment services direct to consumers through TV and video on Xbox LIVE and Xbox 360 consoles with 23 million Xbox LIVE members in 26 countries as well as Zune and Windows Phones."

Yahoo!'s Connected TV widgets launched at CES 2009 and are available on Sony, Samsung, LG and VIZIO HDTVs delivering video on demand from Blockbuster and Netflix, Twitter, Facebook, fantasy football and other internet content as Java/XML apps. They've appeared on Intel CE3100 hardware -- predecessor to the CE4100 powering the Google TV systems. The platform claims 7,000 active developers, over 50 widgets currently available and over 150 more coming by the end of the year.
Samsung:"Consumers love television, and Yahoo! is enhancing the TV viewing experience by adding high quality, personally-relevant Internet content across devices from the world's largest consumer electronics manufacturers. Yahoo! is leading, innovating and delivering amazing consumer experiences, and there is no doubt in my mind that the next phase of the Internet revolution will be televised." -- Ronald Jacoby, Chief Architect, Yahoo! Connected TV

Samsung's Internet@TV platform debuted last year and utilized on Yahoo! Connected TV widgets bringing content to TVs and Blu-ray players. In 2010, it's next step is the Samsung Apps service bringing functionality across a wide range of devices including TVs, receivers, Blu-ray players and mobile phones.
Rovi:"For Samsung, the Connected TV era began more than three years ago and achieved a breakthrough in 2010 with the introduction of Samsung Apps, the world's first TV application store now available in more than 100 countries. Our success has been fueled in part by partnerships with diverse Google properties including YouTube, Picasa, and Maps via our Internet@TV service in addition to our application partners on the Samsung Mobile platform. Samsung is focused on delivering the most complete Internet TV experience to consumers and this will guide our approach as we consider introducing new services or platforms such as with Google. A relationship with Google TV is currently under consideration." -- David Steel, Executive Vice President of Marketing at Samsung Electronics America

Known in another life as Macrovision and TV Guide, Rovi may already be behind the program guide on your TV or set-top box. While cable and satellite operators have not widely deployed some of its more interesting UIs, it's already looked for a way over the top by adding a guide via Samsung's widget service, and recently showed off its latest design, the TotalGuide shown above.
VIZIO:"Rovi sees the Google announcement today as another milestone in the continued development of Internet TV. We're working with Google to help bring next-generation guides to the users of Google TV. This includes TotalGuide applications for the Android platform as well as TV data. We believe a critical component for creating a simplified consumer experience is data that allows you to browse and discover more content." -- Corey Ferengul, EVP of Product Management and Marketing, Rovi

VIZIO has dived wholeheartedly into the Connected HDTV pool, building its entire UI on the Yahoo! Widgets design, including all the standard TV controls in the same interface where you'll find Twitter and various video on-demand services. VIZIO Internet App HDTVs have a QWERTY Bluetooth remote to make internet browsing easier and its Super Bowl ad was devoted to informing customers it could bring the best of the internet to your TV.
People of Lava:"We are excited that other technology providers are following VIZIO's lead to offer easy to access Internet content on their televisions. We were the first to integrate Wifi and Bluetooth technology into HDTV sets to enable a simple, intuitive HD internet steaming experience and as a result more than 70% of VIZIO Internet Apps consumers are connecting and streaming actively with VIZIO products. We at VIZIO are constantly evaluating new opportunities to further enhance the value of our products, including those brought to us by Intel and Google. Our goal is to continue to make the best of the Internet easily available to consumers with products that they can afford." -- Laynie Newsome, Co-founder and CSO

People of Lava surprised everyone by being the first to announce an Android TV, and expects to have its product on shelves well ahead of Sony's Google TV.
"It is of course a challenge for a small TV-manufacturer in the premium range to set out to launch a whole new kind of integrated product and experience. I see today's events as a confirmation that we did the right thing to dare to press ahead." -- Christian Svantesson, Managing Director of People of Lava.
"The more Android-based TVs on the market, the better. This would mean that the development of Apps, adapted for the TV will get a boost, and more Apps will become available. And what's good for the customers is good for us. We can already offer a number of Apps that we think will give our customers the most instant benefit, such as Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, an open Web-browser etc. And our App-store, which is already up and running, offers more Apps, ready to be downloaded." -- Mathias Adolfsson, Chief Technical Officer at People of Lava.
MIPS:"The fact that we and others can create new Apps for our customers, actually gives our customers a product that "comes alive", and will continue to evolve with the customers, in the direction of their own choice. Choice is so central here. Not dictating, but giving options. We see this as a great start towards our vision of a "Window to the world" - giving our customers the standing option to choose not only what they want to see or do, but also when." -- Martin Ljunggren, Chief Marketing Officer at People of Lava.

You may or may not know the name MIPS, but the company's chips are embedded in TVs and set-top boxes all over, already running Yahoo! Widgets. It's already worked on an HD-friendly version of Android for its processors that could have a wider reach than the Google TV platform.
Roku:"MIPS Technologies was pleased to see today's Google TV announcement. Google's announcement is clearly well aligned with our own vision of the future connected television and entertainment experience. To date, MIPS Technologies has synergistically supported Google's commitment to the architecture-neutral, open source nature of Android by ensuring that our licensees have access to the best available software ecosystem for Android on MIPS-Based solutions. Google TV is the latest architecture-neutral solution from Google and, leveraging our past work with Android and our ongoing relationship with Google, MIPS Technologies is now in an excellent position to work with our licensees as Google TV moves beyond its initial reference platforms and into mainstream development within the digital home market-a market where MIPS is already the number one processor architecture." --Art Swift, Vice President of Marketing, MIPS Technologies

PlayOn:"I think we are intrigued like the next person on this announcement. There's been a lot of talk about how this is going to kill off stand alone devices like Roku or aggregators like Boxee, but it seems to me that price will play a big role in this and also the fact that this platform and the devices being created are geared towards combining linear TV (from your cable or satellite provider) with Over the Top content. In that regard, the competition is TiVo or Sezmi or Zillion TV or the cable MSOs that are also attempting to converge both.
We feel we still sit in a great spot. One that delivers an incredible amount of premium content to the TV for an incredibly low price and while we are still complimentary to cable/satellite today, we are adding more and more content including live sports, music, movies and TV shows, etc. that are making our platform competitive in this space. A rising tide raises all ships and Google is creating awareness in the market for devices and services that delivery content streamed over IP to the TV. Now it's on us to execute and make sure our message is out there for customers." -- Brian Jaquet, Director, Corporate Communications

"It is very difficult to assess what Google TV means for PlayOn at this time. In many ways it may be an opportunity, given that it will likely be DLNA-capable and can therefore act as a PlayOn device. Even if it is not DLNA-capable, we could likely develop an app which added DLNA to it. But I think too many details are unclear at this time, including exactly what type of sites/technology it will truly be able to support, and what its price-point will be.One of the main benefits of PlayOn is that it does not require the consumer to purchase or dedicate any new equipment to experience the videos on their TV. People have generally shown a big aversion to purchasing yet another "box" to access internet TV through, and there is little we can see about the Google TV device that will change that aversion at this time." -- Jeff Lawrence, CEO, PlayOn.






















Im not a big fan of Android and many of you know that.... BUT I can safely say that Google TV will beat everything else.
@Jaylittles531
Could not agree more. They are the certified kings of bringing new tech / innovation for now.
@Jaylittles531 I want to see Google TV compete with Microsoft's IPTV. *relaxes, grabs popcorn*
@Jaylittles531
I would hold my thought on this... In the end, it's a matter of how the partners can profit from it. It's a business, not a charity. Google has been good at introducing new technologies and ideas (not so much but still some), however, other than its core business in searching and advertisement, they don't really have a solid business model for the partners. Nexus One is a good example of how a good idea could fail if the market and service providers cannot profit from it.
Other than the hardware providers who gets a one time profits from selling the setup box, such as Logitech, what's the plan for the content providers? Those are not free, the cost will be there somewhere. How different it can be from the existing service providers' also evolving system? There are too many questions to be answered.
@Jaylittles531
I think is time to buy some GOOG stocks...
@Jaylittles531
I'm having a hard time finding info on DVR capabilities for this.. that's what it needs.
@jocantonio
I hope it can push content to Android Phone/Tablet and iPhone/iPad on your WIFI network. It would be great to have a real portable TV for outside by the pool or in the kitchen. I think would be a killer feature.
@Jaylittles531 kinda irrelevant if everything else is a failure. It's highly unlikely Disney and Fox will participate in any Google initiative on the content side. Also, if Comcast acquires NBC Universal, I am not sure they would provide content either....with only Sony and other minor studios onboard, we're looking at a glorified YouTube....
I bet the main reason Hulu isn't on Android FroYo although Flash is now supported is because of Disney, Universal and Fox and their ownership stake in Hulu. You're more likely to see an iPad Hulu app before Hulu on Android - ironic as it may seem!
@Jaylittles531
No it won't, and for one simple reason, it demands a keyboard/mouse. And it can't even play back local content.
@Jaylittles531: look: dear everyone: as long as Google's in the market, it's better than you, a-ok?
@Jaylittles531
Someone Forgot to mention APPLE TV.
Oh wait, it is already DEAD.
@Jaylittles531
there could be a possiblity of a new Apple TV coming that apple is planning on releasing after seeing this
@jaffreywali
Disney is definitely not going to support google with Jobs on the board
@Jaylittles531 Up until the next Apple TV comes out anyways..
Google is unstoppable!
Really?? How'd that Nexus One work out for them???? LoL
@Ramius124 yeah apart from that, google is unstoppable
@ChairmanMeow Google is one trick pony. wave/buzz/nexus/picasa/docs almost everything they have done(execept search) is failure
@memeslayer I use every single one of those products. wtf are you talking about?
Can't beat free.
@memeslayer
Don't hate because your life is crap.
@memeslayer
Being that wave wasnt publicly released and was invite only up until a few days ago, its hard to call it a failure. The coming year(s) will say if it was or wasnt.
@ChairmanMeow
Nope, Google is very stoppable. Especially in this venture.
Google may have content and a platform but they don't control the delivery. Any ISP with an television axe to grind and a cap to wear could stop this service dead in the water.
Time Warner Cable being one.
@Ramius124 Lets see.. they have an Android device that gets first dibs on new Android versions and the owners of the device love it. They sold a satisfactory amount of devices through an online-only medium with no third-party or TV marketing. If the Nexus One wasn't successful through online-only sales, don't you think Sprint and Verizon would have no problems letting them sell the phone themselves minus the carrier bloatware and restrictions?
I can already see that little Android bot having those logos for breakfast...
Unfortunately they don't really stand a chance. With a big name like Google releasing something for free pretty much guarantees that you are dead.
Kinda like TomTom and Garmin, it's just a matter of time.
@Ben64 well maybe except Microsoft. The rest should've given up yesterday.
@Ben64 Where have you read that this will be free? It's gonna cost at least a few hundred dollars, which is on par with the rest of the competition.
@engadgetcomexcludeengadget It's from Google, so I would assume it's free for the hardware manufacturer.
For example Boxee. if D-Link drops the Boxee box today, and go with Google TV, they won't need to pay anybody one single penny, and with Google's name, it's much more marketable. It's really pretty simple.
@Ben64 Are you kidding me? The company that fired Allard and shut his Courier down since the iPad was released?
Microsoft as we know it can't piece together a good idea even if someone shat the details into Balmer's mouth.
Kin - total fucking disaster - it's Microsoft out of touch with the market.
Worldwide Telescope which was launched with much fanfare - their homepage gives a date of 2009. We are now halfway through 2010.
They had terraservers for a decade before they mimiced google earth/maps satellite maps.
@Ben64 Well, D-Link doesn't have to pay Google, but then they don't have anything to distinguish themselves from the rest of the market. Unless D-Link can come up with something truly innovative -- which, I doubt given it's D-Link -- they're just caught in the game of selling commodity hardware with Google's software, dependent on Google's software update patterns, and being squeezed on margins by competitors providing the same service with the same software.
If they stick with Boxee -- especially if it's some sort of exclusive relationship -- then they have a unique service, and then they have the opportunity themselves (in association with Boxee) to make it a unique and compelling device. They're not relying on Google and competing with other vendors selling the exact same thing.
Plus, Boxee should be out sooner than these Google devices. Shouldn't it? Wasn't it promised soon?
@dextroz
You must not have ever used Windows Media Center for TV, compared to every single other TV application, it is leagues above. It puts everything together for you, and syncs with XBOX360 with out a problem at all. That being said, there are more modifications that would be nice, but I doubt that GoogleTV is going to have anything on it.
@dextroz
"Microsoft as we know it can't piece together a good idea even if someone shat the details into Balmer's mouth." - soo true!
YAWN at what the "others" are saying. Here are 16 ideas for Google TV, a taste of things to come. As for me, I can't wait for the Chrome extension which displays my current page on TV...
http://www.product-reviews.net/2010/03/18/google-tv-list-of-16-app-ideas-for-android-developers/
I would like to see more integration and I think Google is the one to do it. The last couple of years have seen a mass free-for-all in the "Smart TV" realm with so many different products and platforms that even some of the more techno-savvy people have shied away from entering. I think that having a major player backing an open source tech can really be the integral push needed to get this rolling into average people's living rooms. I think WMC would be well served to play nice with GTV.
What about AppleTV? Even though it sucks.
@wakeup Apple TV doesn't really connect to anything other than iTunes, I don't see it as being in the same space.
@wakeup Who knows what Apple is going to do with AppleTV. My guess is they are going to incorporate iphone OS onto it and make it controllable thru your ipad and iphone.
I dont see any of these companies being successful with web on the TV as its just a novelty. There are to many other ways to get on the net and the last thing people want is a keyboard and mouse hooked to the TV. I know when I go to watch TV its to take a break from the internet and veg out. Everything I would get with GoogleTV I have on my desktop/laptop/phone/slate etc..
@jsbaugh
Google TV will be popular if they can work out deals with about all major TV manufactures to have it installed in the TV's. I am excited because I always wanted to build a HTPC but never got around to doing it and Google TV is open source.
@jsbaugh
You can use any android device as a remote control for Google TV as well ... it was demo'ed during Google I/O
Wonder if my G1 will become a Tv...
i know people, especially people in tech and the guys at engadget, know this but it's going to make smarter TVs. basically, TVs won't be TVs anymore. i'm not saying they have to be run full-on windows 7 and have great hard drives, etc, but they can't be dumb outlets anymore. and i know that "smart TVs" have been around for years, but to me they still aren't smart enough to just say "hey, there's some content, i'll play that". look at how many options engadget lists on this page. clearly no one's nailed it yet. it's not going to take just partnership with OEMs but someone controlling the process more tightly from the cradle to the grave, just like with smartphones (ala what google did with the nexus one, what apple did with the iPhone, and what microsoft is doing with windows phone 7). the content SERVICES (boxee, microsoft mediaroom, and now google tv) are great. but it's still not a unified experience. tv's have to be more interactive with the services pushing them content.
Google's motto seems to be: Why do just one thing really great when you can do a thousand things somewhere between "it's just okay" and "at least it's free!"
Kidding! They do a lot of things that are really great. But they do seem to be stretching themselves a little thin. My worry with Google TV is that it'll add another layer (and hence complexity) into your home entertainment system without adding any content that is truly unique -- I mean, it doesn't replace your tivo or your blu-ray or your cable package, it just "enhances it" (at least that's the impression I got from the Logitech presentation)
But if it can make using a home entertainment system easier for my girlfriend, I'll definitely be getting one :)
Notable by its absence on this list is ActiveVideo Networks' CloudTV platform, which in terms of its client device requirements is as lightweight as it comes. http://www.activevideo.com
I had last year samsung plasma with yahoo widget is horrible, so slow to navigated and is useless.
Google TV = Apple TV knock-off that sells your search history
@Maybach Will probably be 100x better than the former.
@N900 come back to tell us when it is not in BETA and actually shipping.
@memeslayer
Look at the companies backing it. Do you think they're stupid? They don't know where the market is heading? Guaranteed to be better than Apple TV. What the hell is Apple TV anyway? Hmm, nobody knows, why? Cos it's shit.
It may be tough to compete with Google TV, since it really does do a great job of integrating stuff (TV, internet, search, smartphones, other AV components, etc.). However, because of its open ecosystem, it opens up a new world of opportunities for value-added applications & services (free/sale/subscription) that leverage the platform.
Perhaps the companies providing competing solutions that are least likely to survive can re-vector their resources to the new opportunities the platform presents.
Google tv is a joke. First and foremost they create no content. It is already there. The Neilson ratings system and the tv folks have their ad business sewn up and don't need a middle man like Google for shit.
So I find Google's intrusion into this space as irrelevant.
Google is doing nothing more than cluster bombing itself the same way Starbucks did when they opened all them damn stores knowing full well they weren't going to make money. They just wanted to appear to grow and to the untrained eye it looked that way. However, when you delved deeper into the abyss, Starbucks was losing money. And they had to close all those stores and get rid of like 9000 employees. Ouch!
Global Crossing had jumped the shark and laid down superfluous fiber optic cable even when the demand had long waned . However, to wall street it appeared there was demand. That was the idea!
Only thing Google is going to do is shuffle the same shit around.
And why the hell do I want to leave my mac/pc just to surf on the tv?
Waste of fucking time.