http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/ Engadget Comments for Panasonic announces 46-, 42-inch plasma 3DTVs for Japan http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/Jun 9th 2010 12:49AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/
Seems to get harder to buy a new TV WITHOUT 3D. I don't want it!]]>Jun 9th 2010 5:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/Jun 9th 2010 12:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/Jun 9th 2010 12:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/]]>Jun 9th 2010 1:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/
Is the lighter, cheaper, battery-free, passive version you see in cinemas really unsuitable for the consumer market? Is the screen technology too expensive?]]>Jun 9th 2010 1:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/26/ready-or-not-the-latest-3d-technology-is-coming-home/]]>Jun 9th 2010 1:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/
So basically, the cheapest home solution for passive polarised glasses is the JVC $9,000 LCD TV?

I agree that's expensive, but no where near what I thought it would be. Surely this means in the very near future that technology will be affordable to the masses?

Or do you think the major manufacturers have gone all in on active shutter and are not going to bother refine technologies such as JVC's Xpol?]]>Jun 9th 2010 4:35AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/
Major production companies have gone active shutter glass because its cheaper for them. The same 120htz tv's they have been making, with 3d tech taped on.

I am holding out for some sort of box that will split the 3d signal into two so I can do this
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/3d-polarized-projector,2589-4.html

However if no-one seriously backs polarization its not going to get any cheaper. :/]]>Jun 9th 2010 2:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/Jun 10th 2010 12:35AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/Any suggestion?]]>Jun 9th 2010 1:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/3d-polarized-projector,2589-4.html

Wait for something that splits the 3d signal into two outputs. Buy the filters and *sigh* another projector.

Otherwise I have heard of LG working on a 3d projector for home use.]]>Jun 9th 2010 2:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/Jun 9th 2010 1:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.shape-upsskechers.com]]>Jun 9th 2010 2:27AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/Jun 9th 2010 2:44AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/Jun 9th 2010 3:21AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/Jun 9th 2010 3:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonic-announces-46-42-inch-plasma-3dtvs-for-japan/I so agree with you xtasi. You pay enough for
the 3D technology. But looking at things now, my rear projection Television I purchased in 2005 was $2,500. It's a different time today though. Most consumers want to get what they pay for. Now, if Panasonic includes three or four pairs of "universal" glasses that should be for the masses, then I'm all in baby. World Cup in 3D would have me sold on these two babies.]]>Jun 9th 2010 6:34PM