Free TUAW iPhone app -- try it now!
AOL Tech

Engadget

FEATURES: Holiday Gift Guide 3D tech comes home
Blog Activity
Blog# of Comments
Luxist1 Comment
The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW)5 Comments
Engadget22 Comments
TV Squad60 Comments
Cinematical18 Comments
The Judith Meskill Weblog1 Comment
Flash Insider2 Comments
Download Squad232 Comments
Engadget HD4 Comments
Slashfood1 Comment
The Social Software Weblog1 Comment
Engadget Mobile3 Comments
The Brad Hill Weblog1 Comment
The Jason Calacanis Weblog16 Comments

Recent Comments:

I agree. The artist has a clearly defined aesthetic and a confident hand. The graphics are primitive, to be sure, but it's a conscious choice--they're by no means sloppy or poor. They're consistent and very cohesive. Whether or not you like that aesthetic is a matter of taste, but regardless of taste I don't think you can call them "awful."
I disagree entirely. Many, many companies use a logotype instead of a logo to identify themselves. My opinion is that if you're going to use your logo (or logotype) as your favicon--and usually you should--it should be as clean and readable as possible. A blurry or unreadable favicon will have leave your customers with a negative--however subtle--impression, and I think that matters.

The real problem with this kind of trick, however, is that subpixel rendering works differently on different types of monitors, e.g. to look good on both CRT and LCD screens a different version of the icon must be displayed for each, and there's no way to do that with current web browsers. Also, subpixel rendering depends on screen orientation, so if you have your monitor turned to portrait orientation, or are using a handheld device that can be rotated, the icon may not render correctly. These are small problems that perhaps we can live with, but when inevitably a new display technology (OLED?) begins to replace LCD monitors, designers who've uses this technique will have to reevaluate their choices.

My true hope is that soon our monitors will pass the visible-pixel threshold, operating systems will adopt resolution-independent interfaces, and subpixel rendering will be nothing but a fond memory of vintage computing.
Great idea, RTMS. I've written up a new tutorial that shows how to set up "Send To" for LiveJournal.
I didn't realize this was news, or I would have taken a screenshot a couple months ago when I left my iPhone (running 2.0 firmware) in the car on a sunny spring day. It took me about 15 minutes of holding it up to the A/C vent to get it cooled down enough that it would let me use it. Pretty funny. You can still slide to get the keypad in case you need to make an emergency call.
Ben Linus, anybody?

Also, Scott above makes a very good point. This format is very reader-unfriendly and serves only to boost ad dollars.
Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm looking for a pair of quality headphones that aren't seemingly made of glass. I'm an avid BMXer which causes me to frequently bash on any type of technology that joins me for my daily riding. I've been through the higher quality headsets in the Skullcandy line as these are supposed to be built for "abuse," which is laughable. I cant wear earbuds or canal buds, as my large ears seem to have a repelling property upon anything that sits in them. Wired or Bluetooth doesn't really matter, but I need something that can hold up to taking a few hits every now and again. I'm trying to keep 'em under $150. Thanks!"

Boss of the Year Entry Form

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.