Only 64 out of 10,000? Since it's a free service that a lot of people only use once, it's safe to assume that at least 64 of those users didn't care if anyone else used their account once they were done with it.

Whether you agree with him or not, his statement is clearly just a scenario. It's not like he said there were WMD's in Canada and spent a trillion US dollars looking for them when they don't exist.

How about this for an inaccurate vignette: "I confirmed with the White House that the man Obama was referring to was Otto Raddatz" We know what it means, but we could say "It's just not true, as you can't confirm anything with a building."

If only it could be that the details of Otto's case aren't exactly the President's illustration, then no one has ever lost their coverage in the middle of treatment because their insurer found other unreported conditions. Oh wait, that part *is* exactly what happened to Otto. Hmmm, maybe that was his point.

Great idea. But thinking about it for 2 seconds, I notice three gianormous flaws: 1) you can play music on anything that has a CPU; 2) the 10 billion players that are already out there can be used ad infintum; 3) and if you upgrade the memory in your player from 16GB to 16PB, then where do you send your $75,000,000 tax payment?

That's not how checks work in the US banking system. By presenting the item as though it wasn't in error, she broke a number of laws. True, it was her *check* but a check isn't money, it's a demand for it against the account it's drawn on. The first $29 of it was "her money," the rest she took intentionally - knowing it wasn't hers. Even though you're not the one who got the cash from the $29,000 error, you should both accept similarly-sized additions to your integrities.

Nonsense - the fact that someone's arrested has no more to do with guilt or innocence than them walking down the street. No matter what, they're innocent until they're proven to be guilty!

The 6th Amendment to the US Constitution:
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and *public* trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence (sic).

Oh come on. Unless you keep your body temperature below 40 degrees Fahrenheit, or have a magic field of bacterial inhibition around you, you gotta wash every day in order to keep them down to a hygienic level. Bacterial populations grow exponentially - your head doesn't get some kind of exemption to math and physics because you don't wanta wash your hair.

Regarding #6, I knew twins that had different birthdays (one born before midnight, and the other after.)

And there were two brothers who were identical, born from the same mother on the same day, but weren't twins.

I don't drive recklessly, in fact, sometimes I think I'm the only one on the road that realizes my vehicle weighs thousands of pounds. But after 40 years of driving, I get a BS ticket every 5 or ten years and frankly, it's not right. I have to drive like it's my job to make ultra sure that the two-digit IQ traffic cops understand that I'm way within the law. These are the same cops and law that my community put in place to be there to protect me and mine - not persecute me! So I for one, think it's a good idea. But it will never work until the equipment is real-time in the car with you. If everybody who sees a speed trap could tap the top of their GPS as they drive by, and everybody with a GPS would know, maybe the cops would find something better to do instead of victimizing the very citizens that ultimately give them the authority to do their job.

Hey, it could be a grey area if it followed you home. Suppose you tried to get away from it and it chases you like the paparazzi (or would that be like a paparazzo?)

You just wait until you're trying to get away from these things and they track you down where you live and camp outside your property line, waiting to chase you into a tunnel where you crash your car.

Yes these malls are in America. With very precious American rights that do give you a say in this.

You have the right not to develop such products in your company, nor to allow any of these in your mall. Simply don't lease the space to them, and you won't have them.

Apparently, the folks who own *this* mall decided otherwise, and that's *their* right.