I would like one. Not for me but my 6 year old :-)

Such a great opportunity to gloat in your anti-Appleism but jeezus, people, how much more bogus can a graph get? So, supposedly, this "brand loyalty" of male iPhone users over 18 plummeted from 50% (50 points? What is it?) to below 20% in 1 week?? I mean COME ON.

House of mirrors.

Zuiko Digital .... is their line of lenses made specifically for their digital cameras. This one happens to zoom. Hence.

@Cesium

You're probably right. The thing is, the reason why a lot of laptops have chicklet keyboards these days probably ain't because Sony and Toshiba had them in the past.

Egad. Nipple? Have you no class?


We like to call it the ThinkPad clit.

No, the thing is those are the only Apple ads that get posted on Engadget as flame bait, and hence the only ones you notice.

As for all this talk about how this series is old and ineffective.... I'm just flabbergasted by the lack of logic and reason by these posters. It's simple; if the ads have become boring and ineffective, they wouldn't be running right now. The fact is, they are still effective, and very much so at that. That's why, after so many years, MS has finally decided to fire back with their own attack ads. So, old yes, ineffective no.

Do these same people complain about how Nike "just do it" ads are so old and ineffective, they should stop running them and move on to something else?

Personally, I've become pretty bored with these ads myself, but that's mostly because I've been seeing them repeatedly on sites like Engadget from the very beginning, over and over again. What you guys really need to understand is that the world is not like you (or I). You are nerds, you are not the norm, people do not think like you. Just because you don't like it does not mean that the world does not like it. Remember when you all hated the iPhone and thought that it would be a huge effin' flop?

Also, this one was funny, even for me. Ridiculous, meaningless, etc. etc., sure. But it's freakin' funny.

All right, another negative Apple news, let's all jump on it!!!!111!!!111

Wait, it isn't? Oh, gosh darnnit. Well, there's always tomorrow.

I doubt VoIP will use substantially more bandwidth than regular voice, and certainly will use less bandwidth than streaming video. If I'm talking via Skype, I'm not clogging the network any more than I would be if I were talking using regular voice.

Don't forget the digital back, Ross. The prices you list don't include the back. Include the back and you're looking at a 20K system. No thanks. I'll wait for the P645D (fingers crossed that it'll hit south of 10K).