| Blog | # of Comments |
|---|---|
| Autoblog | 2 Comments |
| Joystiq | 5 Comments |
| Engadget | 103 Comments |
| AdJab | 4 Comments |
| TV Squad | 3 Comments |
| Cinematical | 7 Comments |
| Engadget HD | 3 Comments |
| The Wireless Report | 13 Comments |
| Engadget Mobile | 175 Comments |
| Fanhouse NFL Blog | 2 Comments |
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
So in a sense, they need each other. Would VZW allow Palm to do its thing without meddling? Probably not, since Apple allegedly walked away from VZW and into the waiting, grateful arms of AT&T because of VZW's meddling nature. We've all seen the way VZW protects its proprietary walled garden offerings such as VZW Navigator and cripples phones that circumvent these services. Would AT&T have been a wise choice as exclusive partner? Probably not, since they're obviously very attached to Apple (but is the opposite true?) and thus would not sink a lot of resources into promoting the Pre/webOS as the best and only thing out there. Would T-Mobile have been a wise choice as exclusive partner? T-Mobile hasn't carried a palm product since the Treo 600, so the lines of communication aren't there....
No, Sprint was the perfect choice for Palm to launch webOS and the Pre. A successful history of working together and a mutual need to regain relevance puts both parties into a situation where they can relate to each other. Palm seems to be holding up their end of the bargain with their incredible presentation at CES - the critics have been silences and the buzz about Palm is higher than it has been in years. YEARS. Now Sprint needs to get their shit together and continue cleaning up all billing, customer service, and image problems... and as a satisfied Sprint customer, I hope they succeed.