| Blog | # of Comments |
|---|---|
| Engadget | 1 Comment |
| Engadget HD | 13 Comments |
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
However (I don't want to be a stick in the mud for everyone on this site), I returned it. Although it showed me why Sony was better than other TV makers, it was too expensive for the current state of technology. The HDMI port on this TV doesn't accept 1080p input and therefore is not as future proof as I first thought. If it did I would still have it.
I decided to go without HD for now until a set come around that meets the SXRD quality and has clear proof of 1080p input. In fact I went without a TV for two months until I could borrow one. I don't think HD technology is settled enough right now to spend $4K on a TV that I might want to upgrade in 2 years.
I may wait for SED. On the other hand, if Sony delivers an SXRD with no elephant ears and tru 1080p over multiple inputs I might just get back in the game. But it won't matter till next football season i guess since that seems to be the best content on HD anyway.