Whatever happened to "Good Things in Small Packages"? I am currently looking for a replacement for my old (1985ish) 26" television set and I am extremely dismayed that I must go large to have good quality in a Flat screen. I don't want to fill up a living-space wall to be entertained and my news anchors don't need to "larger than life", their egos are big enough thank you. While I admit that being able to veiw natural vistas in its wide expanse like I was there could be interesting, I just don't have the room inside my house. More to the point, I cannot afford to purchase another domicile, and my current property is too small add a media room to my current home. Can these wonderful, high quality panaramic details be put in a smaller device, or is that just not technologically feasible? Am I asking too much? Or am I,and others like me, not financially significant. I await a response, but I'm not holding my breath. Nor am I expecting a satisfactory solution to my dilemma.
Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I need help! I want a small pocket camcorder but I'm not sure which one to get. I don't want to fall into the hype of the Flip because I worry two hours won't be enough. What should I be looking for when considering a small camcorder and where can I get a good quality one with expandable memory? Thanks!"
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
