| Blog | # of Comments |
|---|---|
| Engadget | 388 Comments |
| Engadget HD | 56 Comments |
| Engadget Mobile | 1 Comment |
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I didn't believe you so I read the article. This is directly copy and pasted from the study: "There is an advantage to big pixels in low light (high ISO) applications, where read noise is an important detractor from image quality, and big pixels currently have lower read noise than aggregations of small pixels of equal area. For low ISO applications, the situation is reversed in current implementations -- if anything, smaller pixels perform somewhat better in terms of S/N ratio (while offering more resolution)."