Microsoft would be better served to (radically) drop the cost of the hard drive instead of releasing a 250GB bundle. So far, that's the only real advantage Sony has IMHO. The way exclusivity deals are worded these days, you can't always count on one console retaining a specific title. On a similar note, why do people seem to care about these 250GB Sony bundles anyway? Wouldn't it just be cheaper to get a HDD+PS3+whatever game?
Quick, what does Michael Pachter think! Geez I hate Sony PR-speak! Like PSN has suddenly improved so much that now it can support digital distribution?!
It already is integrated into at least two video cards; one is the Leadtek Winfast PxVC 1100. I can't remember who makes the second, but it runs about $600 USD. They're supposed to be optimized for video encoding with TMPGEnc 4.0 XPress.
Firstly, I'd argue that the iPhone is "evolutionary", not "revolutionary" since quite a few people are still able to function quite well without it and it borrows heavily from many old concepts/existing devices (albeit with better integration).
Secondly, has this guy really played a lot of iPhone games? They are constantly improving, but the battery life sucks! Give me at least 4 - 6 hours of playtime, then we can talk about the iPhone as a gaming platform.
Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"What is the best wireless surround sound speaker solution? I have a home theater where running wires is just not feasible. I have my own speakers, so I don't want a system that has speakers with integrated wireless. I've done a far amount of research and have only come across a few companies that even offer a reasonable solution: KEF, Kenwood and Rocketfish. Is there anything else out there? What do you recommend? Thank you!"
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
