Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm looking for a pair of quality headphones that aren't seemingly made of glass. I'm an avid BMXer which causes me to frequently bash on any type of technology that joins me for my daily riding. I've been through the higher quality headsets in the Skullcandy line as these are supposed to be built for "abuse," which is laughable. I cant wear earbuds or canal buds, as my large ears seem to have a repelling property upon anything that sits in them. Wired or Bluetooth doesn't really matter, but I need something that can hold up to taking a few hits every now and again. I'm trying to keep 'em under $150. Thanks!"
Isn't $600 a bit expensive??? When you figure that it'll probably only come with 1 controller, so you'll have to buy another controller (probably $50). Then, you'll want to buy a couple of games with it (probably $60 each). Then, there's sales tax. When you add it all up you're probably looking to spend close to $1000. And the funny thing is that the PS3 was meant to be played on an HDTV and about 90% of people out there don't even own an HDTV (at least not yet). You're actually spending more for your videogame entertainment than you are for the TV that you're viewing this on. The good thing is that the prices have come down on alot of HDTVs. Fortunately, I own an HDTV and I also happen to own an Xbox 360 (for which I'm happy with). But, the vast majority or people out there who are looking to buy the PS3 will probably be hooking it up to some old analog 27" TV.
And getting back to the total cost for the PS3 and accessories, after spending all that money, are you people still able to pay your bills?? Your rent??? Your mortgage??? Hey, I work hard for my money (like most people). And the average family income simply can't afford to spend that kind of money.
The PS3 might be considered a "value" at $600. But, Sony needs to do some more market research and realize that $600 is a bit steep for most (not all, but most) hard working people out there.
Just my opinion