You guys forgot to mention two disc version (for those that don't need the digital copy), disc three is just the digital copy. The 2 disc version is $5 cheaper. It’s also ironic that the picture you are using for this article shows the 2 disc version.
At the moment I'm using a BD-RW in my HTPC. If I get a stand alone player it will be a profile 2.0. Not suprised that people are holding of buying stand alone players.
A fuzzy image with crappy edge enhancement is not HD in my opinion. I think the photos they took when they originally landed on the moon look better than this.
I have to agree until they consistently produce Blu-ray discs which are equal in quality to HD DVD discs then there is no point in comparing player prices. Even if Blu-ray players where half the price of HD DVD players I wouldn't buy one at this point in time. If Blu-ray wants to win the format war they need to produce better quality discs, not drop the price of the player.
Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I have a MacBook Pro and an Xbox 360 and I would like to get a 20- to 24-inch display that will support both devices. The speakers should be inbuilt, or there should be an aux out on the display to hook up external speakers. Help! Please!"
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
