Free TUAW iPhone app -- try it now!
AOL Tech

Engadget

FEATURES: Holiday Gift Guide 3D tech comes home
  • Josh
  • Member Since Jan 23rd, 2006
Blog Activity
Blog# of Comments
The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW)40 Comments
Engadget6 Comments
Engadget HD6 Comments
Blog Maverick1 Comment

Recent Comments:

Seriously, check out Plasq.com's Skitch... it's fantastic and free.

http://plasq.com/skitch
Hit A, I think, the transport control bar comes up... there's a button that looks like a film strip. Tap that to scroll through the various screens.
Allen, you're doing it backwards. Give folks your GV number and forward that to the iPhone. That's the only way you can do it until GV allows number porting.
re: overly sensitive touchpad pinch zooming

I use MultiClutch to selectively turn OFF certain gestures in Safari. Just add Safari to the Application list, add two new rules ("Zoom In" and "Zoom Out,") and then assign to them key command sequences... that do nothing. Like "apple+option+crtl+shift+]"

http://wcrawford.org/2008/02/28/everytime-i-think-about-you-i-touch-my-cell/

Works great for me!
Can't believe no one has suggested the vastly superior Dupin:
http://dougscripts.com/itunes/itinfo/dupin.php
I use MailPlane to send iPhoto pics through Gmail. Love it!

http://mailplaneapp.com/
If the obvious reason for the rejection is "that it would likely be a bandwidth hog on the network" then why didn't Apple make this VERY CLEAR to the developer who worked hard t create it? Instead, they said it "duplicates the functionality of iTunes."

Why would they lie? Their explanation sounds worse. I don't think there's much to read into here, they rejected it for the reason they said they rejected it.
If the obvious reason for the rejection is "that it would likely be a bandwidth hog on the network" then why didn't Apple make this VERY CLEAR to the developer? Instead, they said it "duplicates the functionality of iTunes."

Why would they lie? Their explanation sounds worse. I don't think there's much to read into here, they rejected it for the reason they said they rejected it.
Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm looking for a solid state drive, around 32 to 64GB, for use in my web server. The drive will contain my web sites and the operating system, either Windows Server 2008 R2 or Ubuntu. Large storage is handled by a separate RAID array, so capacity is not an issue. Rather, I am looking for the fastest, longest-lasting, and most reliable drive under $150 that is suitable to my application. Any thoughts? Thanks!"

Boss of the Year Entry Form

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.