Quote: "For the record, I'm cool with 720p. I hope the "1080p-or-death" crowd doesn't start their crying *again*."
Instead of whining about the fact that some of us are disappointed in the lack of quality vendors supporting the best available products why don't you just be satisfied with what you've got and let the rest of us tell the industry what we want?
It's too bad. You either have a lack of interest in better quality, or simply don't have the finical ability (could be desire but then that would imply humility which you obviously don't have) to afford the best products out there.
Assuming that's the case, it's truly unfortunate and I wish you all the best, but instead why don't you just accept that some of us would prefer to have the best quality available when shopping in the market and are disappointed at the lack of quality vendors in the market at the moment.
If you really are tired of hearing about it then perhaps you should join the crowd pushing for it (it would at least be more productive then whining about the existence of those who do) so that the industry finally delivers something to those that aren't satisfied with mediocre HD (and 720p IS mediocre in the world of HD).
I don't know about everyone else but I was really looking forward to Apple TV. Now that they've finally released their specs I have to say I'm extremely disappointed.
I'm new to the home theater market but am looking to invest in equipment that will keep up with the times for a few years. I have been waiting with wallet-in-hand for this product and now I figure I might as well wait.
Apple has underwhelmed me. What happened Stevie? I thought you were going to actually try. The Apple TV UI is the last thing I care about in this product. Sure it looks great and I'd love to have one, but you've half-assed the output and crippled any chance to hook me. Give me a decent output spec and then we'll talk. For now, I'm going to assume you're not serious about giving me a superb HD-quality product. Next time around I'm not going to come running.
Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm looking for a solid state drive, around 32 to 64GB, for use in my web server. The drive will contain my web sites and the operating system, either Windows Server 2008 R2 or Ubuntu. Large storage is handled by a separate RAID array, so capacity is not an issue. Rather, I am looking for the fastest, longest-lasting, and most reliable drive under $150 that is suitable to my application. Any thoughts? Thanks!"
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Instead of whining about the fact that some of us are disappointed in the lack of quality vendors supporting the best available products why don't you just be satisfied with what you've got and let the rest of us tell the industry what we want?
It's too bad. You either have a lack of interest in better quality, or simply don't have the finical ability (could be desire but then that would imply humility which you obviously don't have) to afford the best products out there.
Assuming that's the case, it's truly unfortunate and I wish you all the best, but instead why don't you just accept that some of us would prefer to have the best quality available when shopping in the market and are disappointed at the lack of quality vendors in the market at the moment.
If you really are tired of hearing about it then perhaps you should join the crowd pushing for it (it would at least be more productive then whining about the existence of those who do) so that the industry finally delivers something to those that aren't satisfied with mediocre HD (and 720p IS mediocre in the world of HD).