Galaxy Quest trumps them all with Alan Rickman in one of his best roles!

Seriously, I like GQ, but Star Trek's receiving high marks for overall quality. Getting blockbusters like this, The Professional, and Fight Club on Blu-ray for only 20 bucks in stores and on Amazon is what everyone's been waiting for.

And I thought Transformers 2 was "the biggest blockbuster of the year." Oh, you mean biggest among films with actors and a plot that weren't overshadowed by gratuitous CGI every five minutes. I totally get it! :)

Because bullets and bloodshed look awesomely crisp in HD!

Somewhat impressive list here, but I honestly don't see how Blu-ray can improve a film like Logan's Run, one my favorites from the '70s. The story was tense and engaging, but the effects were downright primitive (e.g., a sentry robot named "Box" who looked like...just YouTube it; you'll see!). Not to mention it won't look as great as most modern transfers (released in 1976). Then again, there IS a Blu-ray of THX-1138, a sci-fi cult classic from '71.

Guess that means A Boy And His Dog, Zardoz, and Silent Running are headed to Blu-ray too. Telepathic dogs FTW!

I'd say Star Trek and Up have to be the most anticipated releases. One is a successful "franchise reboot" (has this been overused or what?), and the other is a Pixar film, which requires no further explanation. Zachary Quinto's dead-on look and mannerism of a young Spock is worth the price of admission alone.

I wouldn't count out Gump or District 9 either; their visuals and sweeping storylines demand high definition viewing.

This set looks great, but I'll wait for it come down from its initial price. From what I've read in the forums, Panasonic's what you want if you're looking for black levels that rival the Kuro.

And plasma isn't dead! Although I own a 120 Hz LCD and love it, I just got a great deal on a Samsung PN50B860 (which also has a super-slim bezel), and the colors are sensational, with black levels as deep as you can get without "crushing" the picture. It really sings when displaying 1080p/24 films (at a perfect 96Hz WITHOUT artifacts or hitching), in addition to flawless 2:3 pulldown of 1080i material, which breathes new life into cable broadcasts and DVDs. A 54" Panny that can do all of this would be a dream come true.

The poll should read "Where do you buy most of your Blu-ray discs?" or have multiple-selection boxes. Between Amazon's used discs and Best Buy's weekly $10 discs (which aren't all bad; they still have "Mongol" for this price and it's beautifully filmed and well written), I'm bulding up a nice collection. Can't forget about eBay's used or like new discs either, with shipping usually very low or included in the "Buy It Now" price.

Slightly off topic, but for those who haven't seen it, you MUST experience "A Bug's Life" on Blu-ray. The transfer is breathtaking and makes you want "The Incredibles" that much more.

I'm a little afraid of autostereoscopic film. It sounds like something that will melt my contact lenses on a 3D HD display. Or make my vision worse at the very least, ha ha. Still, it's amazing that for the first time, gimmick-free 3D could soon be mainstream like 1080p/24
is now for most diplays.

"You can't stop progress!"
- from Hardware

BTW Richard, great reporting and "appearance" in the headline.

I have the original model with the latest beta firmware (I think). Does anyone know if the 1080p/23.976 glitch has been fixed? Selecting this resolution makes the unit revert to 480i, which looks as awful as it sounds. I'm hoping it'll be corrected for this model at least.

Well, at least Sons of Anarchy is in HD. For the uninitiated, you owe it to yourself to watch Season 1 on DVD/Blu-ray and DVR the current ones until you've caught up. I never thought I'd care about a biker gang drama, but it's an in-your-face show with solid acting all around, especially from Ron Perlman and Katey Segal.

Too bad FX never broadcast The Shield in HD. That show, like this one, demanded to be seen in glorious 16:9.

@ Ken

Not trying to start anything, but how can you be sure of the number of "HD DVD owners in the world" who have simply discarded their movies and/or players? That really doesn't make sense if it means one less Blu-ray version to buy. And chances are good that the codecs and supplements will be the same to save studios time and money instead of developing a Blu-ray version from scratch. I have yet to see an AVC version of a VC-1-encoded disc from Universal, Warner, or Paramount.

If I can find an HD DVD on the Web for two bucks, it's mine---even it's a title or genre I'm not crazy about. I'm sure there are plenty of discs out there that haven't been given the Blu-ray treatment. It's just economics for most of us, not "fanboyism" or spiteful stubbornness.