<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget RSS Feed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 AOL Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ask Engadget: can you use an Android tablet as a graphics tablet?]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/18/ae-tablet-graphics/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/18/ae-tablet-graphics/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/18/ae-tablet-graphics/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/18/ae-tablet-graphics/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Ask Engadget can you use an Android tablet as a graphics tablet" data-src-height="196" data-src-width="432" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/05/askengadgetlogo09-1368105925.png" /></a></p>

<p>We know you've got questions, and if you're brave enough to ask the world for answers, then here's the outlet to do so. This week's <a href="http://ask.engadget.com/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Ask Engadget</a> inquiry is from Xan, who wants Cintiq functionality without paying Cintiq prices. If you're looking to ask one of your own, drop us a line at <strong><em>ask [at] engadget [dawt] com.</em></strong></p>

<blockquote>
<p>"I'm a student and I'm considering staying on to do graphic design, and I really like the look of Wacom's Cintiq devices. Unfortunately I couldn't afford one even if I sold a kidney, so I was wondering if I could turn an Android tablet into a cheaper version? I figure a device like the Galaxy Note 10.1 with its Wacom digitizer would be a good fit, so is there a way to do it? Thanks!"</p>
</blockquote>

<p>We're sucking in air through our teeth, as we're sorry to say, we can't think of a way this could be done successfully. There's a few problems like no software, a lack of bandwidth and doubts over the accuracy of a tablet to replicate such a sophisticated piece of hardware. That said, perhaps the forthcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/10/surface-pro-driver-adobe-photoshop/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Surface Pro software update</a> might solve this problem altogether, but an Android tablet? We're not so sure. But if there's anyone out there who has made it happen and wants to share their revelation, why not leave a note below?</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/peripherals/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Peripherals</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/18/ae-tablet-graphics/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>AE</category><category>Ask</category><category>Ask Engadget</category><category>AskEngadget</category><category>Engadget</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:45:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20563571</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ask Engadget: best desktop PC speakers?]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/04/ae-desktop-speakers/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/04/ae-desktop-speakers/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/04/ae-desktop-speakers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/04/ae-desktop-speakers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Ask Engadget best desktop speakers" data-src-height="196" data-src-width="432" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/05/askengadgetlogo09.png" /></a></p>

<p>We know you've got questions, and if you're brave enough to ask the world for answers, then here's the outlet to do so. This week's <a href="http://ask.engadget.com/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Ask Engadget</a> inquiry is from James, who wants to break into audio mixing, but needs some noisyboxes for his desk. If you're looking to ask one of your own, drop us a line at <strong><em>ask [at] engadget [dawt] com.</em></strong></p>

<blockquote>
<p>I'm no audiophile, but I would like some decent quality sound for my desktop. I've tried 4.1, 2.1, 2.0 setups but none of them made me very happy, which isn't helping my attempts to get into professional audio work. Is there a lower-end line of speakers that the pros use that I'd be able to afford?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Fortunately for you, James, we can turn this question over to our podcast producer, who suggested that you could do worse than a pair of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/KRK-RP6G2-Powered-Monitor-Speaker/dp/B001A6IC7Q">KRK RP6G2 Rockit</a> speakers, which come in at $400 for a pair. They're studio monitors rather than purely desktop speakers, but if you want to start working in audio then you're probably better off with these. Of course, it wouldn't be Ask Engadget unless we turned this question over to our clever crew of commenters, so if you know of anything that's better (or cheaper) then fire your answer into the comments below.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portable-audio-video/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Portable Audio/Video</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/04/ae-desktop-speakers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>AE</category><category>Ask</category><category>Ask Engadget</category><category>AskEngadget</category><category>Audio</category><category>Engadget</category><category>Speaker</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 23:20:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20555771</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ask Engadget: best WiFi router for super-fast Fiber?]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/27/ae-best-fiber-router/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/27/ae-best-fiber-router/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/27/ae-best-fiber-router/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/27/ae-best-fiber-router/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Ask Engadget best WiFi router for superfast Fiber" data-src-height="196" data-src-width="432" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/04/askengadgetlogo09-1366961097.png" /></a></p><p> We know you've got questions, and if you're brave enough to ask the world for answers, then here's the outlet to do so. This week's <a href="http://ask.engadget.com/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Ask Engadget</a> inquiry is from Travis from Provo, who is a jammy individual, wants to replace his router. If you're looking to ask one of your own, drop us a line at <strong><em>ask [at] engadget [dawt] com.</em></strong></p><blockquote> <p>  "I'm currently living in Provo UT, and my wireless router just died. I want to replace it with something that's going to handle Google Fiber as that's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/25/provo-council-approvals-fiber-network-sale-to-google/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">on its way</a>. What do you recommend?"</p></blockquote><p> Given the number of places that are now getting super-speed fiber, we're very interested in the results of this one. We ask a similar question each year, and in 2012 you were all voicing your support for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/07/linksys-reveals-a-trio-of-802-11ac-wifi-routers-with-beamforming/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Cisco/Linksys</a> hardware, ASUS' <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/14/asus-to-launch-5-new-routers-moving-data-never-looked-so-good/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">RT-N66U</a> and D-Link's DIR-655. The only question is what'll come out on top in 2013, so get commenting, friends.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Wireless</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Networking</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/27/ae-best-fiber-router/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>AE</category><category>Ask</category><category>Ask Engadget</category><category>AskEngadget</category><category>Engadget</category><category>Fiber</category><category>Networking</category><category>Wireless</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 22:45:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20549489</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ask Engadget: best slow-motion camcorder for around $200?]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/20/ae-slow-mo-camera/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/20/ae-slow-mo-camera/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/20/ae-slow-mo-camera/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/20/ae-slow-mo-camera/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Ask Engadget best slowmotion camcorder for around $200" data-src-height="196" data-src-width="432" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/04/askengadgetlogo09-1366366554.png" /></a></p><p> We know you've got questions, and if you're brave enough to ask the world for answers, then here's the outlet to do so. This week's <a href="http://ask.engadget.com/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Ask Engadget</a> inquiry is from Philip, who wants to document his son's baseball adventures. If you're looking to ask one of your own, drop us a line at <strong><em>ask [at] engadget [dawt] com.</em></strong></p><blockquote> <p>  I'm looking for a HFR camcorder, as I like to record my son playing baseball and play it back in slow motion. The Kodak PlayFull looked like the solution, offering 120fps at 1,280 x 720 for $200, but then Kodak axed its camera businesses and it never made it to market. What other options, therefore, exist for 120fps video recording around a similar price bracket?</p></blockquote><p> To be honest, slow-motion recording at such a low price is going to mean you'll only be able to get pictures at dreadful resolutions. If you're happy with footage at 640 x 480, then you could snag a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-S100-Wide-Angle-Stabilized/dp/B005MTME3U">Canon Powershot S100</a>, but even that comes in at $319 from Amazon right now. It's a shame your budget couldn't stretch to $1,000, as we're desperate to find out if <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/09/jvc-procision-camera/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">JVC's Procision</a> is worth the hype. It's at this point that we should probably turn this over to the Engadget community and get them to share their wisdom -- so join in, HFR fans.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cameras/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Cameras</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/20/ae-slow-mo-camera/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>AE</category><category>Ask</category><category>Ask Engadget</category><category>AskEngadget</category><category>Engadget</category><category>HFR</category><category>Motion</category><category>Slow</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:46:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20545616</dc:identifier>

</item>
</channel></rss>