<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget RSS Feed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 AOL Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[US Air Force chief: Boeing laser "not operationally viable" as far as you know]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/us-air-force-chief-boeing-laser-not-operationally-viable-as-f/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/us-air-force-chief-boeing-laser-not-operationally-viable-as-f/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/us-air-force-chief-boeing-laser-not-operationally-viable-as-f/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/02/23/war-not-time-to-change-dont-ask-tanker-rfp-out-tomorrow/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/strangelovelaser.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" /></a></div>
Seeing a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/boeing-747-destroys-ballistic-missile-with-laser/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Boeing 747 destroy a liquid-fueled ballistic missile</a> with a megawatt-class laser is undoubtedly one of the tech highlights of the year so far. Unfortunately, as impressive as the demonstration was, it's unlikely to be militarized in its current state. While the Air Force's chief of staff, General Norton Schwartz, called the demonstration "a magnificent technical achievement," he has no intention of introducing the fat tub of chemical goo into the theater of war. Solid state lasers are the future "coin of the realm," according to Schwartz, not Boeing's chemical laser which he claims, "does not represent something that is operationally viable." Of course, the chemical core of the laser was just a single component of the ALTB that managed to track, target, and destroy a moving projectile from an airborne platform. And while the technology might not be viable for broad deployment, that doesn't mean that it won't be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/04/boeings-air-to-ground-laser-test-a-success-and-we-have-the-vid/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">fitted into a special forces AC-130 Gunship</a> for covert operations until solid state lasers (currently <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/23/northrop-grumman-creates-100-kilowatt-laser-could-usher-in-worl/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">limited to about 100kW</a>) achieve megawatt status. Just saying.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/us-air-force-chief-boeing-laser-not-operationally-viable-as-f/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>ac-130</category><category>altb</category><category>boeing</category><category>c-130</category><category>chemical laser</category><category>ChemicalLaser</category><category>gunship</category><category>laser</category><category>military</category><category>Norton Schwartz</category><category>NortonSchwartz</category><category>solid state</category><category>solid state laser</category><category>SolidState</category><category>SolidStateLaser</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:31:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19371059</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Boeing's air-to-ground laser test a success, and we have the video to prove it]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/04/boeings-air-to-ground-laser-test-a-success-and-we-have-the-vid/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/04/boeings-air-to-ground-laser-test-a-success-and-we-have-the-vid/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/04/boeings-air-to-ground-laser-test-a-success-and-we-have-the-vid/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/091004-boeingatl-01.jpg" /><br />
<div align="left">Fans of future wars, heads up! What might at first blush look like a poorly placed roman candle is actually proof positive that Boeing's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/atl,boeing?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Advanced Tactical Laser</a> (ATL) is ready to do some damage. Sure, when we heard last month that the company's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/03/boeings-airbone-laser-finally-blows-something-up/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">tests at the White Sands Missile Range</a> were a success, we responded the same way that we always do: "video or it didn't happen." But now that we've seen it in action, we have one more question: When will its big brother, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/abl,boeing?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">the 747-mounted ABL</a>, get its day in the limelight? We'll keep you posted. <br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/02/atl_test_vid/">The Register</a>]<br /></div>
</div>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Misc</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/04/boeings-air-to-ground-laser-test-a-success-and-we-have-the-vid/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>advanced tactical laser</category><category>AdvancedTacticalLaser</category><category>airborne laser</category><category>AirborneLaser</category><category>atl</category><category>boeing</category><category>chemical laser</category><category>ChemicalLaser</category><category>defense</category><category>laser</category><category>us air force</category><category>UsAirForce</category><category>wargadget</category><category>weapon</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph L. Flatley]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:37:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19183739</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Boeing's airborne laser finally blows something up]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/03/boeings-airbone-laser-finally-blows-something-up/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/03/boeings-airbone-laser-finally-blows-something-up/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/03/boeings-airbone-laser-finally-blows-something-up/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/09/laser-beams-pew-pew-rm-eng.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<div align="left">It's been a long haul marked by <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/25/boeings-airborne-laser-begins-flight-tests-future-uncertain/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">funding cuts</a> and some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/high-powered-jet-mounted-laser-one-step-closer-to-flying-the-te/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">important</a> but rather <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/14/boeings-airborne-laser-shines-a-light-on-a-missile-mid-flight/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">unexciting</a> tests, but it looks like Boeing's much-ballyhooed airborne laser has now finally actually blown something up, real good. According to Boeing and the US Air Force, that happened over the White Sands Missile Range on August 30th, when an C-130H aircraft equipped with the Advanced Tactical Laser (or ATL) locked on to an unspecified ground target and fired the 12,000lb high-power chemical laser to make the target disappear from the face of the Earth. That successful test seems unlikely to change the laser's place in the Defense Department's arsenal, however, which has already been scaled back significantly from the earlier, more ambitious plans for a whole fleet of aircraft equipped with the weapon.<br />
<br />
[Via <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/09/03/0227210/Airborne-Boeing-Laser-Blasts-Ground-Target?from=rss">Slashdot</a>]</div>
</div>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Misc</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/03/boeings-airbone-laser-finally-blows-something-up/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>advanced tactical laser</category><category>AdvancedTacticalLaser</category><category>airborne laser</category><category>AirborneLaser</category><category>atl</category><category>boeing</category><category>chemical laser</category><category>ChemicalLaser</category><category>laser</category><category>us air force</category><category>UsAirForce</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:36:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19150478</dc:identifier>

</item>
</channel></rss>