<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Reports' Fisker Karma gets fixed, testing resumes, for now]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/fisker-karma-part-two/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/fisker-karma-part-two/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/fisker-karma-part-two/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/fisker-karma-part-two/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/fiskerbreakdown-1331639930.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> Remember <em>Consumer Reports'</em> bought a Fisker Karma that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/">broke down</a> while on the test track? Well after it had made the 200-mile round-trip to the dealership, it turned out the inverter cable and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/01/fisker-karma-recall-is-official-239-cars-will-need-their-batter/">battery</a> were both faulty and replaced them, before fully recharging the vehicle. The car has now been returned to the test track where a full review can begin -- give it a week, and we'll start taking bets on if it actually gets that "recommended" rating.</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/fisker-karma-part-two/">Consumer Reports' Fisker Karma gets fixed, testing resumes, for now</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/fisker-karma-part-two/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20191952/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/fisker-karma-part-two/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Breakdown</category><category>Consumer Reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>Fisker</category><category>Fisker Karma</category><category>FiskerKarma</category><category>Hybrid Electric Vehicle</category><category>HybridElectricVehicle</category><category>Karma</category><category>Plug in Hybrid</category><category>PlugInHybrid</category><category>Recall</category><category>Testing</category><category>Tom Mutchler</category><category>TomMutchler</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fisker Karma breaks down in CR test, risks that 'recommended' rating (video)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/fiskerbreakdown.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> <em><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/consumer+reports/">Consumer Reports</a></em> splashed out $107,850 to buy its own <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/26/fisker-karma-boss-nabs-first-set-of-keys-spose-wed-do-the-sam/">Fisker Karma</a>, but before the car had traveled 200 miles, it had broken down. Partway through calibration testing on the <em>CR</em> Track, the car's dashboard began issuing warnings, but when tester Tom Mutchler pulled over to identify the issue, it wouldn't get going again. Mutchler was forced to call the dealership, located 100 miles away, to collect it on a flatbed for repair. It's the first time in memory that the testing organization can recall a vehicle breaking down partway through testing, but when it comes to the Karma, you can only be sure that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/01/fisker-karma-recall-is-official-239-cars-will-need-their-batter/">nothing's</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/fisker-karma-battery-poses-potential-safety-issue-for-about-50/">too</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/with-federal-loans-blocked-fisker-halts-work-on-project-nina-l/">calamitous</a>.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fisker Karma breaks down in CR test, risks that 'recommended' rating (video)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/">Fisker Karma breaks down in CR test, risks that 'recommended' rating (video)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 09 Mar 2012 18:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20189935/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Breakdown</category><category>Consumer Reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>Fisker</category><category>Fisker Karma</category><category>FiskerKarma</category><category>Hybrid Electric Vehicle</category><category>HybridElectricVehicle</category><category>Karma</category><category>Plug in Hybrid</category><category>PlugInHybrid</category><category>Recall</category><category>Testing</category><category>Tom Mutchler</category><category>TomMutchler</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 18:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Reports: Verizon has highest satisfaction rate among major US carriers, AT&amp;T is lowest]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/consumer-reports-verizon-has-highest-satisfaction-rate-among-ma/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/consumer-reports-verizon-has-highest-satisfaction-rate-among-ma/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/consumer-reports-verizon-has-highest-satisfaction-rate-among-ma/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/consumer-reports-verizon-has-highest-satisfaction-rate-among-ma/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/consumerreports.png" style="width: 279px; height: 128px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 12px 10px; float: right;" /></a>It's annual satisfaction <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/survey/">survey</a> time for <em>Consumer Reports</em>, and the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ConsumerReports/">magazine</a> has a few results to share in anticipation of next month's issue. It appears that regional provider <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/10/consumer-cellular-rolls-out-mobile-captions-service-atop-nokia-e/">Consumer Cellular</a> topped the charts -- the survey rated scores from 66,000 online subscribers -- though Verizon was ranked the highest out of the four major players for the second year in a row, followed closely by Sprint and T-Mobile. According to the survey, the latter company was still "significantly better" than last-place AT&amp;T. The full results will be published in the January 2012 issue. Your own personal experience with each provider may vary depending on your locale, of course, but 66,000 people have certainly made their voice heard.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/consumer-reports-verizon-has-highest-satisfaction-rate-among-ma/">Consumer Reports: Verizon has highest satisfaction rate among major US carriers, AT&amp;T is lowest</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/consumer-reports-verizon-has-highest-satisfaction-rate-among-ma/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20122014/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/consumer-reports-verizon-has-highest-satisfaction-rate-among-ma/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>att</category><category>consumer cellular</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>ConsumerCellular</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>results</category><category>satisfaction</category><category>sprint</category><category>survey</category><category>t-mobile</category><category>verizon</category><category>vzw</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Molen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Reports finds iPhone 4S to have worthwhile antennas, says newer iPhone 4 is still problematic]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/08/consumer-reports-finds-iphone-4s-to-have-worthwhile-antennae-sa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/08/consumer-reports-finds-iphone-4s-to-have-worthwhile-antennae-sa/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/08/consumer-reports-finds-iphone-4s-to-have-worthwhile-antennae-sa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/08/consumer-reports-finds-iphone-4s-to-have-worthwhile-antennae-sa/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/2010-07-10strength.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>"<strong>Consumer Reports recommends the iPhone 4S.</strong>" It's only half a dozen words, but to the engineers (and marketers) at Apple, it spells "relief." After being profusely impacted by Consumer Reports' <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/consumer-reports-confirms-iphone-4-antenna-problems-and-so-do/">decision</a> to recommend <i>against</i> buying the iPhone 4 due to those <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Antennagate/">Antennagate</a> issues, the entity has allowed all in Cupertino to breath a sigh of relief by effectively declaring the reception issue dead on the newest edition. To quote:<br /><blockquote> <p>  <em>"Apple's newest smart phone performed very well in our tests, and while it closely resembles the iPhone 4 in appearance, it doesn't suffer the reception problem we found in its predecessor in special tests in our labs. In special reception tests of the iPhone 4S that duplicated those we did on the iPhone 4, the newer phone did not display the same reception flaw, which involves a loss of signal strength when you touch a spot on the phone's lower left side while you're in an area with a weak signal. (The iPhone 4, which is still available, continues to exhibit that problem, we confirmed in tests of new samples of the phone. Because of the flaw, we continue to omit the iPhone 4 from our list of recommended models, despite its otherwise fine performance.)"</em></p></blockquote>In other words, even the newer samples of the iPhone 4 (perhaps even <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/14/sprint-says-the-iphone-4s-4-add-up-to-its-best-device-family/">that one</a> for Sprint?) continue to have antenna quirks, but at least the latest and greatest seems to have addressed 'em. Hit the source link for the full report.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/08/consumer-reports-finds-iphone-4s-to-have-worthwhile-antennae-sa/">Consumer Reports finds iPhone 4S to have worthwhile antennas, says newer iPhone 4 is still problematic</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/08/consumer-reports-finds-iphone-4s-to-have-worthwhile-antennae-sa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20101301/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/08/consumer-reports-finds-iphone-4s-to-have-worthwhile-antennae-sa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antenna</category><category>antennagate</category><category>apple</category><category>call</category><category>calling</category><category>connection</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>death grip</category><category>DeathGrip</category><category>fix</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone 4</category><category>iphone 4s</category><category>Iphone4</category><category>Iphone4s</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>problem</category><category>reception</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple tops J.D. Power customer satisfaction survey, grim reading for RIM and Nokia]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/09/apple-tops-j-d-power-customer-satisfaction-survey-grim-reading/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/09/apple-tops-j-d-power-customer-satisfaction-survey-grim-reading/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/09/apple-tops-j-d-power-customer-satisfaction-survey-grim-reading/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/09/apple-tops-j-d-power-customer-satisfaction-survey-grim-reading/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/jdpower.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Not only is Apple <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/04/apple-now-the-worlds-largest-smartphone-manufacturer-samsung-c/">shipping the most smartphones</a>, it's also shipping the <em>best</em> smartphones -- if you believe the stats in J.D. Power and Associates' latest US customer satisfaction survey. It gave the iPhone a score of 838, versus HTC's handsets in second place with 801 and an industry average of 788. Sammy got a disappointing 777, but we guess it might have fared better if the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/28/samsung-galaxy-s-ii-review/">Galaxy S II</a> had been quicker to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/30/galaxy-s-ii-for-sprint-atandt-and-t-mobile-hands-on/">cross the Atlantic</a>. Hapless <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/RIM">RIM</a> got shunted into fifth place, having come second in 2010. You'll find plenty more factoids in the PR after the break, including evidence that people just <em>love</em> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/4G">4G</a>. Well, we could have told you that.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/09/apple-tops-j-d-power-customer-satisfaction-survey-grim-reading/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple tops J.D. Power customer satisfaction survey, grim reading for RIM and Nokia</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/09/apple-tops-j-d-power-customer-satisfaction-survey-grim-reading/">Apple tops J.D. Power customer satisfaction survey, grim reading for RIM and Nokia</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/09/apple-tops-j-d-power-customer-satisfaction-survey-grim-reading/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20038567/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/09/apple-tops-j-d-power-customer-satisfaction-survey-grim-reading/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011</category><category>Apple</category><category>consumer</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>customer</category><category>customer satisfaction</category><category>CustomerSatisfaction</category><category>HTC</category><category>J.D. Power</category><category>J.D. Power and Associates</category><category>J.d.Power</category><category>J.d.PowerAndAssociates</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>Samsung</category><category>satisfaction</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>study</category><category>survey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple deleting mentions of Consumer Reports' iPhone 4 piece on forums, can't delete your thoughts]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/apple-deleting-mentions-of-consumer-reports-iphone-4-piece-on-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/apple-deleting-mentions-of-consumer-reports-iphone-4-piece-on-f/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/apple-deleting-mentions-of-consumer-reports-iphone-4-piece-on-f/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/apple-deleting-mentions-of-consumer-reports-iphone-4-piece-on-f/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/10x0625obv1241hold.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
...or can they? In case Apple has somehow managed to perfect the art of selective disremembrance across a wide population, here's a refresher: <em>Consumer Reports</em> has thrown down the gauntlet, stating that it "can't recommend" the iPhone 4 until the antenna issues are fixed, issues that its labs and ours have <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/consumer-reports-confirms-iphone-4-antenna-problems-and-so-do/">verified quite substantially</a>. Apple apparently isn't happy about that, and has taken to deleting threads about the <em>Consumer Reports</em> article from its support forums. Now, Apple deleting threads from its support forums is nothing new; outside of "regular" moderation, the company routinely deletes discussion of hardware flaws that it's not ready to 'fess up to, or just generally negative lines of thought about its products. Good thing the internet's a big place, and if Apple's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/02/apple-iphone-4-reception-problems-a-software-issue-fix-coming/">not going to admit</a> the antenna issue, there are plenty of ways to gripe about it. Feel free to express yourself in the comments below, for instance!<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/apple-deleting-mentions-of-consumer-reports-iphone-4-piece-on-f/">Apple deleting mentions of Consumer Reports' iPhone 4 piece on forums, can't delete your thoughts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/apple-deleting-mentions-of-consumer-reports-iphone-4-piece-on-f/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19551450/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/apple-deleting-mentions-of-consumer-reports-iphone-4-piece-on-f/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antenna</category><category>antenna issue</category><category>AntennaIssue</category><category>apple</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone 4</category><category>Iphone4</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Reports confirms iPhone 4 antenna problems -- and so do we]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/consumer-reports-confirms-iphone-4-antenna-problems-and-so-do/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/consumer-reports-confirms-iphone-4-antenna-problems-and-so-do/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/consumer-reports-confirms-iphone-4-antenna-problems-and-so-do/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/consumer-reports-confirms-iphone-4-antenna-problems-and-so-do/"><img alt="" border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/2010-07-10strength.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>Although there's never been any question that there's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/30/iphone-4s-antenna-problem-looks-worse-than-it-is-but-its-stil/">something going on</a> with the iPhone 4's fancy new antenna system, we really haven't seen any rigorous testing confirming that the issue is real, severe, and affects every phone. That just changed: <i>Consumer Reports</i> tested three iPhone 4s and several other AT&amp;T phones in their RF isolation chamber that simulates varying levels of signal from every carrier, and found that the iPhone 4 was the only handset to suffer signal-loss issues. What's more, CR directly says that its findings call <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/02/apple-iphone-4-reception-problems-a-software-issue-fix-coming/">Apple's explanation of a miscalculated signal meter</a> into question since the tests "indicate that AT&amp;T's network might not be the primary suspect." CR found that simply putting duct tape over the bottom-left corner is enough to alleviate the issue -- we're guessing that's Jony Ive's worst nightmare -- and says that while the iPhone 4 has the "sharpest display and best video camera" of any phone it's tested, it simply can't recommend the device until Apple comes up with a permanent and free fix to the antenna problem. Ouch.<br /><br />Of course, we couldn't sit around waiting for someone else to test the iPhone 4 in a more controlled way, so we actually asked our good friend Erica Sadun from <a href="http://tuaw.com"><em>TUAW</em></a> to write us a <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2010/07/06/video-evidence-of-the-iphone-4-death-grip-this-time-with-real/">bespoke signal strength app</a> for iOS 4. Obviously we couldn't submit it to the App Store, but we've been running it on all of our phones here at Engadget and we can independently confirm <i>Consumer Reports</i>' finding that there's a serious signal attenuation issue with the iPhone 4's antenna -- every phone we've tested displays dropped signal when held with the bottom left corner covered. Now, what we don't know is whether that signal attenuation consistently affects call quality and data rates, which we suspect is more directly related to the network in the area; some of our iPhone 4s drop calls and experience low data rates with alarming frequency, while others -- like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/22/iphone-4-review/">our review unit</a> -- have almost never dropped a call and have had no data problems. However, now that we've confirmed and clarified that the antenna issue affects every iPhone 4, we can take on the next step, which is sorting out exactly when and where the issue is most severe. Either that, or Apple can do something to actually fix the issue -- we'll just have to wait and see. For now, check our app in action after the break.<br /><br /><strong>Update:</strong> To clarify, "here at Engadget" is a <em>virtual</em> location -- our iPhone 4s are actually located across the country in San Francisco, Chicago, and New York, and we saw the app respond that way regardless of location. Dropped calls and other effects weren't as consistent, however, and we're still testing to sort out when the effects of the antenna issue are the most severe.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/consumer-reports-confirms-iphone-4-antenna-problems-and-so-do/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer Reports confirms iPhone 4 antenna problems -- and so do we</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/consumer-reports-confirms-iphone-4-antenna-problems-and-so-do/">Consumer Reports confirms iPhone 4 antenna problems -- and so do we</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/consumer-reports-confirms-iphone-4-antenna-problems-and-so-do/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19550816/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/consumer-reports-confirms-iphone-4-antenna-problems-and-so-do/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antenna</category><category>antenna issue</category><category>AntennaIssue</category><category>apple</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone 4</category><category>Iphone4</category><category>signal</category><category>signal strength</category><category>signal strenth issues</category><category>SignalStrength</category><category>SignalStrenthIssues</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[First 3D showdown pits Samsung vs Panasonic]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/13/first-3d-showdown-pits-samsung-vs-panasonic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/13/first-3d-showdown-pits-samsung-vs-panasonic/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/13/first-3d-showdown-pits-samsung-vs-panasonic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/electronics/2010/03/3d-tv-3dtv-comparison-test-reviews-labs-bluray-3d-content-3d-glasses-crosstalk-three-d.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/ces20103deverywhere28lg600.jpg" alt="Panasonic 3DTV" /></a></div>
Both <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/caption-contest-3d-is-a-mind-blow-everyone-can-agree-on-that/">Samsung</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/10/panasonic-3d-home-entertainment-system-goes-on-sale-to-a-country/">Panasonic</a> started selling 3DTVs with great fanfare this week, but only Consumer Reports bought both and started testing them head to head. This is hardly a full review, but initial impressions seem to confirm what we saw at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/CES/">CES</a> which is that Panasonic's 3D has the edge. To be more specific "in the 3D mode, its (Panasonic's 50-inch VT-20 series) lack of crosstalk and great black levels really made three-dimensional images pop." Of course some will always prefer LCD over plasma, but the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/first-panasonic-3dtv-review-in-great-blacks-and-the-best-3d-any/">initial reviews</a> seem to indicate that plasma's great contrast and super fast response time go a long way in delivering a great 3D experience.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/13/first-3d-showdown-pits-samsung-vs-panasonic/">First 3D showdown pits Samsung vs Panasonic</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/13/first-3d-showdown-pits-samsung-vs-panasonic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19397883/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/13/first-3d-showdown-pits-samsung-vs-panasonic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3D</category><category>3DTV</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>hd</category><category>panasonic</category><category>Samsung</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung BlackJack II tops Consumer Reports' list of best smartphones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/samsung-blackjack-ii-tops-consumer-reports-list-of-best-smartph/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/samsung-blackjack-ii-tops-consumer-reports-list-of-best-smartph/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/samsung-blackjack-ii-tops-consumer-reports-list-of-best-smartph/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/cell-phones/?p=375"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgetmobile.com/media/2007/10/samsung-bj2.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Sometimes it's the unsung workhorses that deserve the lion's share of the praise, and that might just be the case with the aging Samsung <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/BlackJackII/">BlackJack II</a> -- a phone that you probably wouldn't expect to top Consumer Reports' January 2009 ratings of popular smartphones. Sure, it may not be the shiniest device on the market these days, but you've got to admit it's just about as functional as you'd ever need a business-class handset to be with GPS, HSDPA, and WinMo 6.1, which gladly sucks up Exchange accounts until you're blue in the face. When you factor in the fact that it runs just $80 these days on an AT&amp;T contract in a choice of four colors... okay, yeah, we can kinda see it. The <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/iPhone3G/">iPhone 3G</a> and <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/g1">T-Mobile G1</a> don't play second fiddle terribly often these days (they were way down in the middle of the Consumer Reports pack in this testing cycle, in fact), so let's just let this old dog have one more moment in the spotlight, shall we?<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/samsung-blackjack-ii-tops-consumer-reports-list-of-best-smartph/">Samsung BlackJack II tops Consumer Reports' list of best smartphones</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.zdnet.com/cell-phones/?p=375>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/samsung-blackjack-ii-tops-consumer-reports-list-of-best-smartph/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1404997/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/samsung-blackjack-ii-tops-consumer-reports-list-of-best-smartph/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>att</category><category>blackjack ii</category><category>BlackjackIi</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>samsung</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ziegler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung BlackJack II tops Consumer Reports' list of best smartphones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/samsung-blackjack-ii-tops-consumer-reports-list-of-best-smartph/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/samsung-blackjack-ii-tops-consumer-reports-list-of-best-smartph/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/samsung-blackjack-ii-tops-consumer-reports-list-of-best-smartph/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/cell-phones/?p=375"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/samsung-bj2.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Sometimes it's the unsung workhorses that deserve the lion's share of the praise, and that might just be the case with the aging Samsung <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/BlackJackII/">BlackJack II</a> -- a phone that you probably wouldn't expect to top Consumer Reports' January 2009 ratings of popular smartphones. Sure, it may not be the shiniest device on the market these days, but you've got to admit it's just about as functional as you'd ever need a business-class handset to be with GPS, HSDPA, and WinMo 6.1, which gladly sucks up Exchange accounts until you're blue in the face. When you factor in the fact that it runs just $80 these days on an AT&amp;T contract in a choice of four colors... okay, yeah, we can kinda see it. The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iPhone3G/">iPhone 3G</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/g1">T-Mobile G1</a> don't play second fiddle terribly often these days (they were way down in the middle of the Consumer Reports pack in this testing cycle, in fact), so let's just let this old dog have one more moment in the spotlight, shall we?<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/samsung/" rel="tag">Samsung</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/atandt/" rel="tag">ATT</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/windows-mobile/" rel="tag">Windows Mobile</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/samsung-blackjack-ii-tops-consumer-reports-list-of-best-smartph/">Samsung BlackJack II tops Consumer Reports' list of best smartphones</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.zdnet.com/cell-phones/?p=375>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/samsung-blackjack-ii-tops-consumer-reports-list-of-best-smartph/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1404991/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/samsung-blackjack-ii-tops-consumer-reports-list-of-best-smartph/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atandt</category><category>att</category><category>blackjack ii</category><category>BlackjackIi</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>mobile</category><category>samsung</category><category>windows mobile</category><category>windowsmobile</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ziegler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Reports tests the Sony XEL-1 OLED TV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/25/consumer-reports-tests-the-sony-xel-1-oled-tv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/25/consumer-reports-tests-the-sony-xel-1-oled-tv/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/25/consumer-reports-tests-the-sony-xel-1-oled-tv/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://shopping.yahoo.com/articles/yshoppingarticles/100/sony-xel-1-our-first-impressions-of-oled-tv/"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" alt="Sony XEL-1 OLED TV" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/3-18-08-sony-xel-1we_04.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Whether you love 'em, hate 'em or qualify 'em with statements like "great for vacuum cleaners; not so much for HDTVs," you've got to respect that fact that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ConsumerReports/">Consumer Reports</a> buys all the goodies it tests. Especially when the item in question is a $2500 Sony <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/XEL1/">XEL-1</a> OLED TV. Overall, we came to the same conclusion as they did: incredible tech appeal, great picture quality, poor input options and "are you kidding me" size-to-dollar ratio. We'll even overlook the fact that the 960x540 pixels isn't <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/15/the-definition-of-high-definition/">truly</a> HD, because at 11-inches it just doesn't matter. Credit to this little tech jewel for eliciting some verbiage that we don't recall ever seeing before from CR -- "... top of your list-provided, of course, that money is no object." Somehow, we don't picture that "money is no object" crowd flipping through the pages of CR.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/reviews/" rel="tag">Reviews</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sony/" rel="tag">Sony</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/oled/" rel="tag">OLED</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/25/consumer-reports-tests-the-sony-xel-1-oled-tv/">Consumer Reports tests the Sony XEL-1 OLED TV</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://shopping.yahoo.com/articles/yshoppingarticles/100/sony-xel-1-our-first-impressions-of-oled-tv/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/25/consumer-reports-tests-the-sony-xel-1-oled-tv/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1175771/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/25/consumer-reports-tests-the-sony-xel-1-oled-tv/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>hd</category><category>oled</category><category>review</category><category>reviewed</category><category>sony</category><category>xel-1</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Kim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shocker: people loathe cellphone carriers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/08/shocker-people-loathe-cellphone-carriers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/08/shocker-people-loathe-cellphone-carriers/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/08/shocker-people-loathe-cellphone-carriers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/12/12-8-07-carrieres.jpg" /><br /></div>
We know, we know, it may be difficult to understand how companies that lock you in the moment you decide on a phone / plan -- only to be about as helpful as a bottomless bucket the moment turmoil arises -- could be hated. Nevertheless, we can't say we're shocked at all to hear that cellphone providers are among the <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/university-of-florida-students-grumble-over-cingular-service/">least liked</a> in all of the service industries. In a recent report released by the Consumer Reports National Research Center, it was found that "fewer than half of respondents were completely or very satisfied with their cellphone service," and sadly, that's hardly different than in years past. Among the biggest gripes were high prices and mandatory contract extensions, and while <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2007/12/04/2007-12-04_consumer_reports_study_garners_rave_revi.html">pro-rated ETFs</a> are fine and dandy, there's still a few less notable <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/category/alltel/">carriers</a> that haven't swallowed that pill just yet. As for internal rankings, Verizon and Alltel each scored higher than the rest, and <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/10/sprint-lambasted-for-disconnecting-whiners-notorious-roamers/">Sprint</a> was found bringing up the rear.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/12/consumer-report.html">Wired</a>]<br /><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=204600833">Read</a> - InformationWeek<br /><a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2007/12/04/2007-12-04_consumer_reports_study_garners_rave_revi.html">Read</a> - NYDailyNews<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/08/shocker-people-loathe-cellphone-carriers/">Shocker: people loathe cellphone carriers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 08 Dec 2007 11:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/08/shocker-people-loathe-cellphone-carriers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1057778/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/08/shocker-people-loathe-cellphone-carriers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>att</category><category>carrier</category><category>carriers</category><category>complaint</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>gripe</category><category>hate</category><category>hated</category><category>issue</category><category>problem</category><category>reports</category><category>sprint</category><category>verizon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 11:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shocker: people loathe cellphone carriers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/08/shocker-people-loathe-cellphone-carriers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/08/shocker-people-loathe-cellphone-carriers/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/08/shocker-people-loathe-cellphone-carriers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/12/12-8-07-carrieres.jpg"  alt="" /><br /></div>
We know, we know, it may be difficult to understand how companies that lock you in the moment you decide on a phone / plan -- only to be about as helpful as a bottomless bucket the moment turmoil arises -- could be hated. Nevertheless, we can't say we're shocked at all to hear that cellphone providers are among the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/11/university-of-florida-students-grumble-over-cingular-service/">least liked</a> in all of the service industries. In a recent report released by the Consumer Reports National Research Center, it was found that "fewer than half of respondents were completely or very satisfied with their cellphone service," and sadly, that's hardly different than in years past. Among the biggest gripes were high prices and mandatory contract extensions, and while <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2007/12/04/2007-12-04_consumer_reports_study_garners_rave_revi.html">pro-rated ETFs</a> are fine and dandy, there's still a few less notable <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alltel/">carriers</a> that haven't swallowed that pill just yet. As for internal rankings, Verizon and Alltel each scored higher than the rest, and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/10/sprint-lambasted-for-disconnecting-whiners-notorious-roamers/">Sprint</a> was found bringing up the rear.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/12/consumer-report.html">Wired</a>]<br /><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=204600833">Read</a> - InformationWeek<br /><a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2007/12/04/2007-12-04_consumer_reports_study_garners_rave_revi.html">Read</a> - NYDailyNews<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alltel/" rel="tag">Alltel</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/atandt/" rel="tag">ATT</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sprint/" rel="tag">Sprint</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/t-mobile/" rel="tag">T-Mobile</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/verizon-wireless/" rel="tag">Verizon Wireless</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/studies/" rel="tag">Studies</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/08/shocker-people-loathe-cellphone-carriers/">Shocker: people loathe cellphone carriers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 08 Dec 2007 11:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/08/shocker-people-loathe-cellphone-carriers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1057777/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/08/shocker-people-loathe-cellphone-carriers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alltel</category><category>atandt</category><category>att</category><category>carrier</category><category>carriers</category><category>complaint</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>Culture</category><category>gripe</category><category>hate</category><category>hated</category><category>issue</category><category>mobile</category><category>problem</category><category>reports</category><category>sprint</category><category>studies</category><category>t mobile</category><category>t-mobile</category><category>tmobile</category><category>verizon</category><category>verizon wireless</category><category>verizonwireless</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 11:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Reports' take on HD DVD / Blu-ray players: it's a tie]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/consumer-reports-take-on-hd-dvd-blu-ray-players-its-a-tie/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/consumer-reports-take-on-hd-dvd-blu-ray-players-its-a-tie/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/consumer-reports-take-on-hd-dvd-blu-ray-players-its-a-tie/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/Consumer_Reports/Consumer_Reports_Rates_Blu-ray,_HD_DVD_Players/1168"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/11/11-18-07-hddvd_vs_bd.jpg"  alt="" /></a>We've taken a look at a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/23/consumer-reports-looks-at-jvcs-hd-58s998/">number</a> of Consumer Reports' <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/27/consumer-reports-looks-at-the-60-inch-vizio-vm60p-plasma/">views</a> in the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/30/consumer-reports-first-look-sharps-37-inch-1080p-lcd-lc-37d9/">past</a>, but the latest critiques give format fanboys (hardly) any ammunition to use against their respective rivals. Reportedly, CR evaluated Pioneer's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/16/pioneer-elite-bdp-94hd-blu-ray-player-gets-official/">DBP-94HD</a> and Toshiba's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/07/toshibas-second-gen-hd-xa2-reviewed/">HD-XA2</a>, and while we were anxious to see which unit "proved" superior, the fact is that both units garnered an impressive 91-percent rating. Granted, the publication did review a total of nine high-definition players from each camp, but the general feeling was that all of them provided "excellent HD picture quality with high-def discs." In the end, we were told that both sides had their pros and cons; for Blu-ray, it's the wider array of players from various manufacturers, while HD DVD maintains the lead on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/toshiba-hd-a2-hd-dvd-player-100-this-friday-wal-mart/">price</a>. Truth be told, we're not terribly shocked to see both camps getting a fair amount of praise, and while we know there's lots of you out there holding out for one to win the proverbial race, it sounds like we could be waiting <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/09/sonys-stringer-blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd-battle-a-stalemate/">a bit longer</a> for the finish line to be crossed.<br /><br />[Image courtesy of <a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/electronics-computers/news-electronics-computers/high-definition-dvd-8-06/overview/0608_hi-def-dvd_ov.htm">ConsumerReports</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/reviews/" rel="tag">Reviews</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/blu-ray/" rel="tag">Blu-ray</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hd-dvd/" rel="tag">HD DVD</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/players/" rel="tag">Players</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/pioneer/" rel="tag">Pioneer</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/toshiba/" rel="tag">Toshiba</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/consumer-reports-take-on-hd-dvd-blu-ray-players-its-a-tie/">Consumer Reports' take on HD DVD / Blu-ray players: it's a tie</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 18 Nov 2007 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/Consumer_Reports/Consumer_Reports_Rates_Blu-ray,_HD_DVD_Players/1168>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/consumer-reports-take-on-hd-dvd-blu-ray-players-its-a-tie/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1042937/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/consumer-reports-take-on-hd-dvd-blu-ray-players-its-a-tie/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blu ray</category><category>blu-ray</category><category>bluray</category><category>Consumer Reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>format war</category><category>FormatWar</category><category>hd</category><category>hd dvd</category><category>HdDvd</category><category>pioneer</category><category>ranking</category><category>rating</category><category>review</category><category>reviews</category><category>tie</category><category>toshiba</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bargain HDTV shopping this holiday season]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/19/bargain-hdtv-shopping-this-holiday-season/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/19/bargain-hdtv-shopping-this-holiday-season/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/19/bargain-hdtv-shopping-this-holiday-season/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/electronics/2007/10/plasma-tvs-may-.html?EXTKEY=I72RSE0"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/08/hdtv_logo.jpg" alt="HDTV" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/11/when-to-buy-an-hdtv/">Despite what we say</a>, many people <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/all-i-want-for-christmas-is-my-hdtv-and-an-apple/">wait till the holiday season</a> to buy and HDTV -- more specifically <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/BlackFriday/">Black Friday</a>. There are a few strategies that work, and Consumer Reports' Electronics Blog has a couple of pointers for this holiday season. While the theme to finding a bargain seems to 720p, they really seem to believe Plasmas might offer the better bargain. In fact, DisplaySearch believes you'll be able to find a 42-inch 720p Plasma for as low as $599 on Black Friday, which seems pretty crazy. This is not to say that there won't be any great deals on LCD TVs, but <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/26/lcd-vs-plasma-in-2007/">just like that normal debate goes</a>, it's really about size since there aren't many Plasmas under 42-inches. No matter what you end up picking up, you can rest assured that although you missed another entire year of HD, you most certainly saved yourself some money.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/19/bargain-hdtv-shopping-this-holiday-season/">Bargain HDTV shopping this holiday season</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.consumerreports.org/electronics/2007/10/plasma-tvs-may-.html?EXTKEY=I72RSE0>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/19/bargain-hdtv-shopping-this-holiday-season/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1017082/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/19/bargain-hdtv-shopping-this-holiday-season/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Consumer Reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>DisplaySearch</category><category>hd</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Panasonic's TH-50PZ700U plasma becomes 'best ever tested']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/panasonics-th-50pz700u-plasma-becomes-best-ever-tested/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/panasonics-th-50pz700u-plasma-becomes-best-ever-tested/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/panasonics-th-50pz700u-plasma-becomes-best-ever-tested/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/10-01-2007/0004673714&amp;EDATE="><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/10-2-07-th-50pz700u.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
While we've seen Consumer Reports take a <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/03/27/consumer-reports-looks-at-the-60-inch-vizio-vm60p-plasma/">gander</a> at a <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/03/23/consumer-reports-looks-at-jvcs-hd-58s998/">number</a> of <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/07/30/consumer-reports-first-look-sharps-37-inch-1080p-lcd-lc-37d9/">HDTVs</a> before, it's been a tick (or maybe "forever" is more fitting) since it's seen "the best flat screen ever tested." Believe it or not, Panasonic's 50-inch <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/tag/TH-50PZ700U/">TH-50PZ700U</a> plasma was actually the recipient of such sensational praise, and such luxuries as the 1080p resolution (oooh) and its ability to "reproduce the finest details, rich vibrant colors and deep blacks" (aaah) apparently set it <em>way</em> ahead of <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/16/pioneer-elite-pro-fhd1-1080p-plasma-wins-product-of-the-year/">the pack</a>. Additionally, the screen was so impressive that reviewers actually stated that it "lent an almost three-dimensional look to images," which we figured was only possible with a pair of truly gaudy glasses. Welp, guess we all know which HDTV you're getting next, eh?<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hdtv/" rel="tag">HDTV</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/panasonics-th-50pz700u-plasma-becomes-best-ever-tested/">Panasonic's TH-50PZ700U plasma becomes 'best ever tested'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/10-01-2007/0004673714&amp;EDATE=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/panasonics-th-50pz700u-plasma-becomes-best-ever-tested/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1003021/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/panasonics-th-50pz700u-plasma-becomes-best-ever-tested/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>best</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>hdtv</category><category>panasonic</category><category>pdp</category><category>plasma</category><category>TH-50PZ700U</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Panasonic's TH-50PZ700U plasma becomes 'best ever tested']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/panasonics-th-50pz700u-plasma-becomes-best-ever-tested/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/panasonics-th-50pz700u-plasma-becomes-best-ever-tested/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/panasonics-th-50pz700u-plasma-becomes-best-ever-tested/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/10-01-2007/0004673714&amp;EDATE="><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt=""  src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/10-2-07-th-50pz700u.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
While we've seen Consumer Reports take a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/27/consumer-reports-looks-at-the-60-inch-vizio-vm60p-plasma/">gander</a> at a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/23/consumer-reports-looks-at-jvcs-hd-58s998/">number</a> of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/30/consumer-reports-first-look-sharps-37-inch-1080p-lcd-lc-37d9/">HDTVs</a> before, it's been a tick (or maybe "forever" is more fitting) since it's seen "the best flat screen ever tested." Believe it or not, Panasonic's 50-inch <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/TH-50PZ700U/">TH-50PZ700U</a> plasma was actually the recipient of such sensational praise, and such luxuries as the 1080p resolution (oooh) and its ability to "reproduce the finest details, rich vibrant colors and deep blacks" (aaah) apparently set it <em>way</em> ahead of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/16/pioneer-elite-pro-fhd1-1080p-plasma-wins-product-of-the-year/">the pack</a>. Additionally, the screen was so impressive that reviewers actually stated that it "lent an almost three-dimensional look to images," which we figured was only possible with a pair of truly gaudy glasses. Welp, guess we all know which HDTV you're getting next, eh?<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/panasonic/" rel="tag">Panasonic</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/plasma/" rel="tag">Plasma</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/panasonics-th-50pz700u-plasma-becomes-best-ever-tested/">Panasonic's TH-50PZ700U plasma becomes 'best ever tested'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/10-01-2007/0004673714&amp;EDATE=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/panasonics-th-50pz700u-plasma-becomes-best-ever-tested/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1003018/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/panasonics-th-50pz700u-plasma-becomes-best-ever-tested/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>hd</category><category>panasonic</category><category>pdp</category><category>plasma</category><category>study</category><category>TH-50PZ700U</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Reports tackles the transition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/consumer-reports-tackles-the-transition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/consumer-reports-tackles-the-transition/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/consumer-reports-tackles-the-transition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2006/10/consumer_reports_logo.jpg" alt="Consumer Reports" />A big part of a successful <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/17/two-years-till-the-analog-shutoff-hopefully/">transition to digital TV</a> is educating the average TV viewer; and while we do our best to help out the enthusiast, the burden to inform <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/05/01/the-dtv-transiation-is-here/">the rest of America</a> falls on newspapers, and magazines like Consumer Reports. In their attempt to let people <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/25/digital-tv-converter-coupons-who-gets-them-and-how-much/">know the facts</a>, we'd say they did a pretty good job, -- much better than some of their other HD articles -- but we wished they'd mentioned the benefits at the beginning instead of the end; after all just about everyone <em>is</em> getting an upgrade.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/regulatory/" rel="tag">Regulatory</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/set-top-boxes/" rel="tag">Set-top boxes</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ota/" rel="tag">OTA</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/consumer-reports-tackles-the-transition/">Consumer Reports tackles the transition</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/electronics-computers/pulling-the-plug-on-analog-tv-206/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/consumer-reports-tackles-the-transition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/919093/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/consumer-reports-tackles-the-transition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Consumer Reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>DTV</category><category>hd</category><category>ota</category><category>Transition</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earth to consumers: extended warranties are a bad deal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/15/earth-to-consumers-extended-warranties-are-a-bad-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/15/earth-to-consumers-extended-warranties-are-a-bad-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/15/earth-to-consumers-extended-warranties-are-a-bad-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/personal-finance/news/november-2006/why-you-dont-need-an-extended-warranty-11-06/overview/extended-warranty-11-06.htm"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2006/11/11.15.06---warranty.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" /></a>It's no secret that you and your loved ones will probably drop some serious coin this holiday season (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/11/25/best-black-friday-bargains/">Black</a> <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/11/09/black-friday-promises-deals-on-hdtvs-riots-likely/">Friday</a> in particular, we're sure), and while future repair <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/21/nintendo-fesses-up-to-ds-lite-hinge-defect-will-fix-for-free/">costs</a> may cross your mind, Consumer Reports recommends that you brush off that extended <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/10/18/cellphone-water-detection-sticker-haphazardly-voids-warranties/">warranty</a> those big box retailers will be shoving in your cart. Stores like Best Buy typically don't garner massive profits from just selling the snazzy new LCD or LCoS televisions, but "around 50 percent" of the extended warranty's pricetag goes straight to their pocket, and rarely do consumers need the coverage <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/05/30/how-not-to-get-best-buy-to-fix-your-broken-tv/">until after it's up</a>. Studies have shown that most major breakdowns occur after the warranty period expires, and that in most cases, the repairs cost "about the same" anyway. Two potential exceptions were <a href="http://rss.engadgethd.com/2006/11/10/rptv-sets-dominate-latest-american-hdtv-sales-figures/">RPTVs</a> and <strike>laptops</strike> Apple computers. The report stated that RPTVs have erroneously high <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/21/microsoft-offering-free-repairs-for-all-2005-xbox-360s/2">repair</a> bills and can be difficult to ship / move when the time comes for fixin', and since Apple's machines only come with "90 days of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/15/laptop-mag-puts-tech-support-through-the-torture-test/">phone support</a>," it was recommended that you pick up that AppleCare box with your purchase. Notably, studies found that notebook damage didn't occur nearly as much as generally believed, especially during the first year or three when the warranty was in effect. Nevertheless, it's estimated that non-savvy consumers will drop a combined $1.6 billion on fruitless warranties this year, so just be sure you're not one of 'em, cool?<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Misc. Gadgets</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/15/earth-to-consumers-extended-warranties-are-a-bad-deal/">Earth to consumers: extended warranties are a bad deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/personal-finance/news/november-2006/why-you-dont-need-an-extended-warranty-11-06/overview/extended-warranty-11-06.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/15/earth-to-consumers-extended-warranties-are-a-bad-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/702311/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/15/earth-to-consumers-extended-warranties-are-a-bad-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>best buy</category><category>BestBuy</category><category>black friday</category><category>BlackFriday</category><category>consumer</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>retail</category><category>retailers</category><category>ripped off</category><category>RippedOff</category><category>shopping</category><category>warranty</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:46:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
