<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Viacom, Paramount, Lionsgate and MGM channel being shopped as digital-basic service]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/15/viacom-paramount-lionsgate-and-mgm-channel-being-shopped-as-di/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/15/viacom-paramount-lionsgate-and-mgm-channel-being-shopped-as-di/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/15/viacom-paramount-lionsgate-and-mgm-channel-being-shopped-as-di/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6595998.html?desc=topstory"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Viacom logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/viacom_logo_042008.jpg" /></a>Although Viacom, Paramount, Lionsgate and MGM pitched in together to form a premium movie channel a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/20/viacom-paramount-lionsgate-and-mgm-team-up-for-new-premium-chann/">while back</a>, the group is now trying to secure itself a place more towards the digital-basic service level to the hefty tune of $1 - $2 per subscriber, per month. Even with market exclusivity and considerable studio marketing muscle on the table, though, we doubt there will be much traction among MSOs at this price point; and honestly, we'd hate to see the content chopped up with ads, um, ad nauseum. Worst of all, though, is that we imagine HD could be one of the first items to get the axe if this service is a digital-basic offering. Don't get us wrong -- we're not looking to spend more money every month -- but we are willing to pay for a quality experience.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/new-content/" rel="tag">New content</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/15/viacom-paramount-lionsgate-and-mgm-channel-being-shopped-as-di/">Viacom, Paramount, Lionsgate and MGM channel being shopped as digital-basic service</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/20/viacom-paramount-lionsgate-and-mgm-team-up-for-new-premium-chann/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/15/viacom-paramount-lionsgate-and-mgm-channel-being-shopped-as-di/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1313786/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/15/viacom-paramount-lionsgate-and-mgm-channel-being-shopped-as-di/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>digital basic</category><category>DigitalBasic</category><category>hd</category><category>lionsgate</category><category>mgm</category><category>new content</category><category>newcontent</category><category>paramount</category><category>viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Kim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:43:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
