<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Just how important is HDMI 1.3?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/22/just-how-important-is-hdmi-1-3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/22/just-how-important-is-hdmi-1-3/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/22/just-how-important-is-hdmi-1-3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.hometheatermag.com/hookmeup/hdmi_101/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/3-20-09-hdmi-cable-end.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Over the years, we've had all sorts of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/13/ask-engadget-hd-is-it-worth-the-wait-for-hdmi-1-3/">discussions</a> surrounding <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/hdmi-1-3-not-living-up-to-its-promise/">HDMI</a>, particular the latest and (supposedly) greatest version, v1.3. Aside from the fact that you'll need v1.3 in order to take full advantage of the hippest audio formats and such, why even care about what version you're using? The lovable geeks over at <em>HomeTheaterMag</em> broke it all down real nice like, explaining the benefits of HDMI 1.3 as well as what the prior versions of HDMI can / cannot do. There's far too much detail to cover in this space, but we'd highly recommend you checking out the read link if you're even remotely interested in learning something that any home theater junkie should know. In other words, don't miss out.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cables/" rel="tag">Cables</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ports/" rel="tag">Ports</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/22/just-how-important-is-hdmi-1-3/">Just how important is HDMI 1.3?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.hometheatermag.com/hookmeup/hdmi_101/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/22/just-how-important-is-hdmi-1-3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1494117/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/22/just-how-important-is-hdmi-1-3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable</category><category>hd</category><category>HDMI</category><category>HDMI 1.3</category><category>HDMI 101</category><category>HDMI 12</category><category>HDMI 13</category><category>Hdmi1.3</category><category>Hdmi101</category><category>Hdmi12</category><category>Hdmi13</category><category>ports</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:54:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
