<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Big cable companies considering packages with, wait for it, less channels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/big-cable-companies-considering-packages-with-wait-for-it-less/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/big-cable-companies-considering-packages-with-wait-for-it-less/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/big-cable-companies-considering-packages-with-wait-for-it-less/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/big-cable-companies-considering-packages-with-wait-for-it-less/"><img hspace="16" border="1" align="left" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/staytuned220.jpg"  alt="" /></a>At one end, we've had the race to add <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/sdv">more channels</a>, more <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/hdvod">VOD</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/docsis">higher  speed internet</a>, but according to report by <em>Reuters </em>the next step for  cable companies -- in the face of growing over the top competition --  could be smaller basic cable packages. It's not that we don't all want  to spend $100 a month to subsidize Jon &amp; Kate's divorce... wait,  that's exactly it. Of course, even if this trend does take off, we're  sure it will be hard to get exactly the right channels for exactly the  right price. Until then, let us know what channels are in the dream  basic cable lineup, or do you prefer your Cable Television World of  Hell package of six hundred and sixty six channels?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/big-cable-companies-considering-packages-with-wait-for-it-less/">Big cable companies considering packages with, wait for it, less channels</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/big-cable-companies-considering-packages-with-wait-for-it-less/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19548492/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/big-cable-companies-considering-packages-with-wait-for-it-less/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>basic cable</category><category>BasicCable</category><category>cable</category><category>hd</category><category>lineup</category><category>package</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NFL Network &amp; Comcast could be close to a deal, moving channel to digital basic]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/nfl-network-and-comcast-could-be-close-to-a-deal-moving-channel-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/nfl-network-and-comcast-could-be-close-to-a-deal-moving-channel-t/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/nfl-network-and-comcast-could-be-close-to-a-deal-moving-channel-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/peter_king/05/17/comcast.nflnetwork/index.html?eref=writers"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/11-21-07-nfl-vs-comcast.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Not that we usually put much stock in Peter King's NFL rumors, but word is the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nflnetwork">NFL Network</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Comcast/">Comcast</a> are close to working out a deal that will put the channel right where the NFL wanted it all along, on the regular digital cable package instead of the added-price sports tier. Since the channel <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/nfl-network-remaining-on-comcast-for-the-time-being/">didn't disappear</a> May 1 as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/09/nfl-network-comcast-slapfight-could-see-channel-yanked-may-1/">threatened</a>, it would seem an agreement on pricing has been reached and according to King things were nearly finished on Thursday and Friday but the two have been hammering out final details even today. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/18/poll-who-is-right-in-the-nfl-network-comcast-battle/">We'll see</a> if this really happens, and not a moment too soon negotiations also under way with Fox, CBS and NBC and labor talks due to get under way with the Players Association.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/nfl-network-and-comcast-could-be-close-to-a-deal-moving-channel-t/">NFL Network &amp; Comcast could be close to a deal, moving channel to digital basic</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 17 May 2009 21:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/peter_king/05/17/comcast.nflnetwork/index.html?eref=writers>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/nfl-network-and-comcast-could-be-close-to-a-deal-moving-channel-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1548582/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/nfl-network-and-comcast-could-be-close-to-a-deal-moving-channel-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>basic cable</category><category>BasicCable</category><category>cable</category><category>carriage</category><category>comcast</category><category>hd</category><category>nfl</category><category>nfl network</category><category>NflNetwork</category><category>sports</category><category>sports tier</category><category>SportsTier</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 21:23:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
